PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026River0 citationsOpen Access

Flood forecast and inundation mapping using a combined hydrologic and hydraulic model on Muga River Abay Basin, Ethiopia

View Full Paper
YZYikeber Ayenew ZelekeOGOtoma Orkaido GaroYAYohannes Mehari Andiye

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop an integrated framework for flood forecasting and inundation mapping in the Muga River Basin.
  • Coupled SWAT, HEC-HMS, and HEC-RAS models used for hydrologic and hydraulic simulations.
  • Simulated flood discharges for various return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 years).
  • Model performance evaluated using historical flood data from 2017.
  • Flood inundation assessed using multiple digital elevation models (DEMs).
  • SWAT produced higher peak discharges than HEC-HMS, offering conservative estimates.
  • ALOS 30 m DEM showed the best agreement with observed flood extent and depth.
  • Framework is applicable to other sub-basins in the Abay Basin for flood hazard mitigation.

Abstract

Abstract This study presents an integrated flood forecasting and inundation mapping framework using coupled SWAT, HEC‐HMS, and HEC‐RAS models for the Muga River basin in the Abay Basin, Ethiopia. The study addresses the limited application of integrated hydrologic–hydraulic modeling and the uncertainty associated with digital elevation model (DEM) resolution in data‐scarce regions. Flood discharges corresponding to 2‐, 5‐, 10‐, 25‐, 50‐, and 100‐year return periods, which are commonly used for flood risk assessment and infrastructure design, were simulated. SWAT was applied for continuous hydrological simulation, while the Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC‐HMS) supported event‐based peak flow estimation. Model performance was evaluated using observed streamflow and the 2017 historical flood event. Flood inundation characteristics were assessed using ALOS 30 m, SRTM 30 m, and SRTM 90 m DEMs to quantify terrain‐related uncertainty. Results show that SWAT produced slightly higher peak discharges than HEC‐HMS, providing conservative estimates for flood risk planning; therefore, SWAT‐derived flows were used for final inundation mapping. Among the tested DEMs, ALOS 30 m exhibited the closest agreement with observed flood extent and depth. The proposed framework is transferable to other sub‐basins of the Abay Basin with similar hydro‐geomorphic characteristics and offers practical support for flood hazard mitigation and planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zeleke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a3e5652765b073a739chttps://doi.org/10.1002/rvr2.70048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper