PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Obesity0 citationsOpen Access

Use of Naltrexone–Bupropion in Persons With Overweight/Obesity and Symptoms of Depression: A Pooled Analysis

View Full Paper
JTJena Shaw TronieriRKRobert F. KushnerCACaroline M. Apovian

Key Points

  • The study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of naltrexone-bupropion in individuals with overweight or obesity presenting with depressive symptoms.
  • Pooled data from four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials was analyzed.
  • Participants included individuals with depressive symptom scores indicating mild depression (N = 511).
  • Assessment of primary outcomes included 56-week weight loss and changes in depression scores, monitored alongside safety data.”
  • Participants using naltrexone-bupropion lost an average of 5.7% of body weight compared to 2.7% for placebo (p = 0.003).
  • Both groups showed similar improvements in depression scores with no significant differences between them.
  • Safety signals did not differ significantly between naltrexone-bupropion and placebo for psychiatric events, depressive increases, or suicidal thoughts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The present study examined the safety and efficacy of the fixed‐dose, extended‐release combination of naltrexone and bupropion (NB‐ER) in individuals with overweight/obesity and mild to moderate symptoms of depression. Methods Data were pooled from four double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials. Participants with baseline Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Self‐Report scores ≥ 14 suggestive of mild or greater depressive symptoms were included ( N = 511). Primary outcomes were 56‐week percent weight loss and changes in depression, as well as safety data for psychiatric adverse events (PAEs), depressive symptom increases, and suicidal ideation. Multiple imputation was applied, and outcomes were compared in the intention‐to‐treat population. Results In participants with symptoms of depression, 56‐week weight loss was significantly greater with NB‐ER (5.7% ± 0.6%) than with placebo (2.7% ± 0.8%; p = 0.003). Participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in depression of −7.1 ± 0.4 with NB‐ER and −6.7 ± 0.5 with placebo, with no significant differences between the groups. NB‐ER and placebo did not differ in safety signals including PAE occurrence (27.5% NB‐ER vs. 22.1% placebo), depressive symptom increases (9.5% NB‐ER vs. 8.8% placebo), or suicidal ideation (1.8% NB‐ER vs. 2.0% placebo). Conclusions NB‐ER appears to be both safe and effective for weight loss when offered to patients with mild to moderate symptoms of depression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tronieri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a3e5652765b073a745fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/oby.70183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Observational study of the differential impact of time-varying depressive symptoms on all-cause and cause-specific mortality by health status in community-dwelling adults: the REGARDS study2018 · 58 citations
  2. 2The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Clinician (IDS‐C) and Self‐Report (IDS‐SR) ratings of depressive symptoms2000 · 442 citations
  3. 3A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment Versus Combined Weight Loss/Depression Treatment Among Women with Comorbid Obesity and Depression2010 · 93 citations
  4. 4Selection of Antiobesity Medications Based on Phenotypes Enhances Weight Loss: A Pragmatic Trial in an Obesity Clinic2021 · 208 citations
  5. 5Impact of diagnosed depression on healthcare costs in adults with and without diabetes: United States, 2004–20112016 · 82 citations