PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement0 citationsOpen Access

Decay Spectroscopy Studies of the Two New Isotopes of Astatine

View Full Paper
HKH. KokkonenKAK. AuranenJUJ. Uusitalo

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the decay properties of the newly synthesized isotopes of astatine, focusing on their unique decay behaviors.
  • Decay-spectroscopy studies of the isotopes of astatine
  • Production of isotopes via fusion–evaporation reactions
  • Utilization of the RITU recoil separator for nucleus separation
  • Comparison with systematics and quasiparticle calculations
  • Identified the heaviest proton emitter to date, which is the isotope 188At
  • Observed that the isotope 190At decays via alpha decay
  • Noted a deviation in one-proton separation energy in 188At, indicating a potential Thomas–Ehrman shift

Abstract

Decay properties of two new isotopes of astatine, \ (^188\) At and \ (^190\) At, were studied in the Accelerator Laboratory of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. The nuclei were produced in fusion–evaporation reactions, and those were separated from the primary beam and target-like products by employing the RITU (Recoil-Ion Transport Unit) recoil separator. Decay-spectroscopy studies were performed for the produced nuclei resulting in information about the decay properties of \ (^188\) At and \ (^190\) At. The \ (^188\) At isotope was found to be the heaviest proton emitter to date. Additionally, the \ (^190\) At isotope was observed to decay via \ (\) decay. The results were compared with the systematics and with non-adiabatic quasiparticle calculations. In \ (^188\) At, a deviation in the one-proton separation energy was observed, indicating the first possible sign of the Thomas–Ehrman shift in heavy nuclei. Abstract Published by the Jagiellonian University 2026 authors

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kokkonen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a815652765b073a7bf0https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.19.1-a28
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper