PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Beneath the Uniform: Modern State Formation and the Institutionalization of Cadet Education in Thailand

View Full Paper
NTNorifumi TAKEISHI

Key Points

  • This article examines how modern military education in Thailand influenced social mobility and consciousness among military elites.
  • Analysis of historical texts related to military education and social reform
  • Examination of the formation of officer training systems from the mid-19th to early 20th century
  • Investigation of recruitment changes in the Cadet School across social strata
  • The Cadet School initially limited to royalty gradually accepted commoners, expanding its social base.
  • Strained relationships emerged between younger officers and traditional elites, emphasizing class conflicts.
  • Increased dissatisfaction among officers with upper military ranks positioned them as agents of social change.

Abstract

This article analyzes the modern officer training system in Siam (Thailand) to examine how social mobility, mediated by the military, influenced the social consciousness of military elites who would later become agents of social change. It investigates the formation of modern military education from the mid-19th to the early 20th century, situating the establishment of officer cadet institutions within the broader dynamics of national modernization and social transformation. The founding of a standing army by King Mongkut (Rama IV) in the 1850s led to the consolidation of a professional military under direct royal authority, independent of the aristocracy. Under King Chulalongkorn (Rama V), military reform became a central pillar of nation-building, culminating in the establishment of the Cadet School in 1887. Although initially exclusive to the sons of royalty and aristocrats, the school gradually opened its doors to commoners, broadening the officer corps’ social base. This change in recruitment?marked by the increasing admission of cadets from a broader spectrum of society, particularly the emerging middle strata?gradually gave rise to a divergence in social consciousness between the officer corps and the traditional ruling elite. As a result, younger and mid-ranking officers became increasingly dissatisfied with both civilian elites and the military’s top echelons. The paper argues that these class conflicts and generational frictions were instrumental in shaping the consciousness of these officers, positioning them as key drivers of social change from the late 1920s to the 1930s.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Norifumi TAKEISHI (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ab35652765b073a8073https://doi.org/10.18952/0002000907
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper