PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Children0 citationsOpen Access

Experiences with an Advance Care Planning Intervention for Children with Life-Limiting Conditions: A Qualitative Study of Families and Clinicians Using the IMplementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit

View Full Paper
JFJurrianne C. FahnerJDJohannes J. M. van DeldenJRJ Rietjens

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore experiences of families and clinicians in advance care planning conversations for children with life-limiting conditions using the IMPACT toolkit.
  • Conducted a multicenter qualitative interview study
  • Included 27 cases of children with life-limiting conditions from February to December 2019
  • Performed inductive thematic analysis on interviews from clinicians and families
  • Clinicians and families valued involvement in ACP conversations based on IMPACT
  • Sharing family narratives enhanced relationships between families and clinicians
  • Limited shared understanding of future care goals was observed

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning is a strategy to define goals and preferences for future care and treatment aligned to patient values. The IMplementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT) provides a holistic, family-oriented approach to involve families of children with life-limiting conditions and their clinicians in ACP, starting early in disease trajectories. This study explores how children with life-limiting conditions, and their parents and clinicians experience ACP conversations based on IMPACT. Methods: A multicenter, qualitative interview study using inductive thematic analysis was conducted. A total of 27 cases of children with life-limiting conditions were included in the study from February 2019 to December 2019. Interviews with 18 clinicians, 24 mothers, 8 fathers and 3 children were conducted. Results: Clinicians and families of children with life-limiting conditions valued to be involved in ACP conversations based on IMPACT. Although it confronted both parents and clinicians with the impact of caring for a child with a life-limiting condition, sharing the family’s narrative resulted in a stronger relation between families and clinicians. This relation was experienced as a good foundation to share values and preferences for future care and treatment. However, a shared understanding of goals of future care, and treatment based on the conversation was experienced to a limited extent. Conclusions: ACP conversations based on IMPACT facilitated family-centered conversations, and were valued by families of children with life-limiting conditions and their clinicians. The meaning of the family’s narrative in relation to goals and preferences for future care and treatment needs ongoing conversations and coaching on the job of clinicians initiating those conversations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fahner et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ad45652765b073a847bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/children13040486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Too vulnerable? Successful practices for conducting research with children and young people who have life-limiting or life-threatening illness2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Aligning goals, not perceptions: making space for illness perception in paediatric decision-making2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Advance Care Planning: Challenges and Approaches for Pediatricians2014 · 45 citations
  4. 4Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups2007 · 43,571 citations
  5. 5Current State of the Art and Science of Patient-Clinician Communication in Progressive Disease: Patients' Need to Know and Need to Feel Known2014 · 106 citations