PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Zeitschrift für Slawistik0 citations

Non-prototypical Aspectual Clusters and Corpus Data: the grozit’ ‘threaten’ cluster in Russian

View Full Paper
AMAnastasia MakarovaUppsala UniversityTNTore Nesset

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze a non-prototypical aspectual cluster including the verb grozit’ and its near-synonyms.
  • Conducted a corpus-based analysis of the grozit’ verb cluster.
  • Examined semantic distinctions among the perfective near-synonyms pogrozit’, prigrozit’, and ugrozit’.
  • Analyzed collocation patterns of related imperfective verbs grozit’ and ugrožat’.
  • Investigated diachronic changes in the usage of ugrozit’.
  • Identified pogrozit’ as associated with gestural threats, while prigrozit’ and ugrozit’ relate to verbal threats.
  • Showed that ugrozit’ is marginal in Contemporary Standard Russian.
  • Determined that grozit’ and ugrožat’ exhibit different collocation patterns.
  • Demonstrated that ugrozit’ influenced the formation of the secondary imperfective ugrožat’.

Abstract

Summary Aspectual clusters and aspectual triplets have received considerable attention in scholarly literature on Russian aspect but are normally not treated together. In the present study, we offer a detailed corpus-based analysis of a non-prototypical cluster that includes a triplet. Exploring the verb grozit’ ‘threaten’ and aspectually related verbs, we demonstrate that the three perfective near-synonyms pogrozit’, prigrozit’ and ugrozit’ are semantically distinct, insofar as pogrozit’ tends to be used about “gestural threats”, while prigrozit’ and ugrozit’ typically occur in “verbal threats”. Ugrozit’ is shown to be marginal in Contemporary Standard Russian. We suggest that the two imperfective verbs grozit’ and ugrožat’ are semantically distinct since they display different collocation patterns. With regard to diachrony, it is shown that ugrozit’ was attested early, and is likely to have motivated the formation of the secondary imperfective ugrožat’ . Ugrozit’ was subsequently (nearly) outcompeted by prigrozit’ and pogrozit’ , which eventually developed affinities for verbal vs. gestural threats. The proposed analysis has implications for Russian linguistics, corpus linguistics, and language pedagogy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Makarova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ad45652765b073a8586https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2026-2003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper