PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene0 citations

Risk factors for malaria among children under five living in net-owning households in Mozambique from the 2022–3 Demographic and Health Survey

View Full Paper
HMHopelyn MooneyMMM MuhammadDODerrick Nyantakyi Owusu

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify household-level factors, particularly mosquito net use, influencing malaria positivity among children under five in Mozambique.
  • Analyzed data from the 2022–3 Demographic and Health Survey involving 1924 households.
  • Employed multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of CU5 malaria positivity.
  • Considered variables such as household mosquito net use, CU5 net use, wealth index, and geographical region.
  • Household net use did not significantly reduce CU5 malaria positivity after adjusting for wealth index.
  • Middle-resource households were 43% less likely to have CU5 malaria compared to lowest-resource households (aOR = 0.57).
  • Highest-resource households were 84% less likely to have CU5 malaria compared to lowest-resource households (aOR = 0.16).
  • Certain regions, particularly Nampula and Cabo Delgado, showed significantly higher odds of malaria positivity.

Abstract

Abstract Background Children under 5 (CU5) in Mozambique are highly susceptible to malaria. Few studies focus on household-level mosquito net use using 2022–3 national survey data (n = 1924). This study analyzed household mosquito net use as a predictor of CU5 malaria positivity. Methods We used a cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression including households with ≥1 CU5 (one record per household). The outcome was household-level CU5 malaria positivity, defined as ≥1 rapid diagnostic test-positive CU5. Variables included household mosquito net use, CU5 net use, wealth index, and region. Results Household net use showed no significant association with CU5 malaria after controlling for wealth index. Wealth index indicated a dose-response, where middle-resource households were 43% less likely (adjusted OR aOR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.84; P .0048) and highest-resource households were 84% less likely (aOR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.27; P .0001) compared with lowest-resource households. Seven regions had higher odds of malaria positivity compared with Cidade de Maputo, with significantly higher odds (P .0005) in Nampula (aOR = 18.97) and Cabo Delgado (aOR = 14.70). Conclusions Campaigns should prioritize lower-wealth households and higher-risk regions to reduce CU5 positivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mooney et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7ad45652765b073a85b7https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trag028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper