PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Optometry and Vision Science0 citations

Prevalence of Dry Eye Subtypes in Clinical Optometry Practice

View Full Paper
JAJulie Albietz

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the prevalence of dry eye and its subtypes based on clinical evaluations.
  • Developed a subtype-based dry eye diagnostic protocol.
  • Evaluated subjects based on McMonnies dry eye survey symptoms and ocular surface staining.
  • Categorized dry eye into subtypes using biomicroscopic signs.
  • Overall dry eye prevalence was 10.8% in the sample.
  • Individuals 40 years or older showed higher prevalence (18.1%) compared to those under 40 (7.3%).
  • Lipid anomaly dry eye (LADE) was the most common subtype at 4.0%.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background Dry eye conditions are now recognized as having multiple causes. A subtype‐based dry eye diagnostic protocol was developed to determine the prevalence of dry eye and dry eye subtypes, and the effects of age and gender, in subjects presenting to clinical optometry practice. Methods Dry eye diagnostic criteria were: presence of one or more McMonnies dry eye survey primary symptoms, fluorescein tear break time <10 s and rose bengal ocular surface staining. Dry eye subtype differential diagnosis was made predominantly on the basis of biomicroscopic signs. Subtype categories were: lipid anomaly dry eye (LADE), aqueous tear deficiency (ATD), primary mucin anomalies, allergic/toxic dry eye (ADE), primary epitheliopathies and lid surfacing/blinking anomalies (LSADE). Results Dry eye prevalence was 10.8% for n = 1584 subjects. Dry eye was significantly more prevalent in subjects 40 years or older (18.1%) compared with those <40 years (7.3%) (p = 0.001). LADE was the most prevalent subtype (4.0%), followed by ADE at 3.1%, LSADE at 1.8%, and ATD at 1.7%. ATD was the only subtype with a significant gender prevalence difference, being more prevalent in women (p = 0.0023). The prevalence of LADE and ATD were significantly greater in those 40 years or older (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0023 respectively). Conclusions The results of this study support a subtype‐based approach to dry eye diagnosis and management in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Julie Albietz (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7b345652765b073a8feahttps://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-9235.2000.tb01116.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper