PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Intramyometrial injection versus intravenous infusion of oxytocin for maintaining uterine contractility during elective caesarean delivery in a randomised controlled trial

SNSatoshi NaruseCAChieko AkinagaYMYusuke Mazda

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of intramyometrial oxytocin versus intravenous infusion for maintaining uterine contractility during elective caesarean delivery.
  • Conducted a randomised controlled trial with 22 women undergoing elective caesarean delivery.
  • Administered an initial intravenous bolus of oxytocin followed by either IMY or continuous IV oxytocin.
  • Assessed total blood loss and haemodynamic parameters post-delivery.
  • No significant difference in total blood loss between IMY and IV oxytocin groups (median 634 mL vs. 642 mL, P = 0.66).
  • IMY oxytocin associated with smaller reductions in blood pressure.
  • Lower phenylephrine requirements noted in the IMY group after delivery.

Abstract

Abstract Oxytocin is commonly administered during caesarean delivery (CD) to prevent postpartum haemorrhage as an initial bolus followed by a maintenance dose. Nearly half of perinatal centres in Japan utilise intramyometrial (IMY) oxytocin. IMY oxytocin is less effective than intravenous (IV) oxytocin as the initial dose for inducing uterine contractions. However, its role as a maintenance dose remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of IMY oxytocin versus continuous IV infusion for maintaining uterine contractility during elective CD. Twenty-two women undergoing elective CD were randomised to receive an initial IV bolus of 1 IU of oxytocin, followed by either 5 IU IMY oxytocin or a continuous IV infusion of 5 IU oxytocin. Total blood loss, along with haemodynamic parameters, was assessed. No significant difference in total blood loss was observed between the IMY and IV groups (median 634 mL 540–718 vs. 642 mL 507.5–706.5, P = 0.66). Conversely, IMY oxytocin resulted in smaller reductions in blood pressure and lower phenylephrine requirements after delivery. While IMY oxytocin did not significantly reduce total blood loss compared with continuous IV infusion, it was associated with better haemodynamic stability. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. Clinical trial registration : Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs041210153, 25/04/2022.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Naruse et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7b695652765b073a973ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46727-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intramyometrial and intravenous oxytocin compared to intravenous carbetocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in elective cesarean section—A quasi‐randomized controlled phase IV non‐inferiority interventional trial2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Randomized double‐blind comparison of the effects of intramyometrial and intravenous oxytocin during elective cesarean section2016 · 14 citations
  3. 3Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis2014 · 6,753 citations
  4. 4Effect of Systemic Vascular Resistance on the Reliability of Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiac Surgery2020 · 24 citations
  5. 5Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin given as i.v. bolus or infusion on women undergoing Caesarean section2006 · 313 citations