PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2017SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología20 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of P2Y12 inhibitors for mortality and stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Single center study of 10 793 consecutive ‘real-world’ patients

View Full Paper
RGRebecca GoslingMYMomina YazdaniYPYasir Parviz

Key Points

  • To compare the real-world clinical effectiveness of oral P2Y12 inhibitors—clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor—on 12-month mortality and stent thrombosis among acute coronary syndrome patients.
  • Analyzed data from 10,793 consecutive ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography in Sheffield, UK (2009–2015) treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel (n=4,653), prasugrel (n=1,223), or ticagrelor (n=4,917).

Structured PICO

Does ticagrelor or prasugrel reduce mortality and stent thrombosis compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes?

P
Population
10,793 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (36% STEMI) undergoing coronary angiography at a single center in Sheffield, UK (2009-2015).
I
Intervention
Ticagrelor or prasugrel (oral P2Y12 inhibitors), with aspirin for all
C
Comparator
Clopidogrel (oral P2Y12 inhibitor), with aspirin for all
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality at 12 monthshard clinical

In a large, real-world ACS cohort, ticagrelor and prasugrel were associated with lower mortality compared to clopidogrel, supporting their preferential use in contemporary practice.

Abstract

Three oral platelet P2Y12 inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, are available for reducing the risk of cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to compare the efficacy of these antiplatelet drugs in contemporary practice. Data were collected for 10 793 consecutive ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography at Sheffield, UK (2009-2015). Since prasugrel use was mostly restricted to the STEMI subgroup, clopidogrel and ticagrelor were compared for all ACS patients, and all three agents were compared in the STEMI subgroup. Differences in outcomes were evaluated at 12 months by KM curves and log-rank test after adjustment for independent risk factors. Of 10 793 patients with ACS (36% STEMI), 43% (4653) received clopidogrel, 11% (1223) prasugrel and 46% (4917) ticagrelor, with aspirin for all. In the overall group, ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.82, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.71-0.96, p = 0.01). In the STEMI subgroup, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with a lower mortality compared with clopidogrel (prasugrel vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.65, CI 0.48-0.89, p = 0.007; ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel: adjHR 0.70, CI 0.61-0.99, p = 0.05). Of the 7595 patients who underwent PCI, 78 (1.0%) had definite stent thrombosis by 12 months. Patients treated with ticagrelor had a lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis compared with clopidogrel (0.6% vs. 1.1%; adjHR 0.51, CI 0.29-0.89, p = 0.03). In the STEMI subgroup, there was no significant difference between the three groups (ticagrelor 1.0%, clopidogrel = 1.5%, prasugrel = 1.6%; p = 0.29). In conclusion, ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel for reduction in both mortality and stent thrombosis in unselected invasively managed ACS patients. In STEMI patients, both ticagrelor and prasugrel were associated with lower mortality compared with clopidogrel, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of stent thrombosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gosling et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cec2f8e84115fc29c51ecdhttps://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2017.1280601
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper