PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026ESMO Open0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus last prior treatment in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: growth modulation index analysis from the ROSEWOOD study

JTJ. TrotmanKBK. BouabdallahFBF. Bijou

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab compared to prior treatments in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
  • Conducted a post hoc intra-patient comparative analysis
  • Used growth modulation index (GMI) for efficacy assessment
  • Compared outcomes of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus last prior treatment
  • Median progression-free survival was longer with ZO compared to O (28.0 vs. 10.4 months)
  • Median GMI was 2.7 in ZO arm and 0.9 in O arm
  • PFS improved in over 60% of patients receiving ZO versus prior treatment

Abstract

Background:The phase II ROSEWOOD study (NCT03332017) compared zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab (ZO) with obinutuzumab monotherapy (O) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) who had received two or more prior lines of systemic therapy.Median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with ZO versus O 28.0 versus 10.4 months; hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.75. Materials and methods:In this post hoc analysis, an intra-patient comparative analysis was carried out using the growth modulation index (GMI) to analyze the efficacy of ZO versus the last prior treatment received by patients in the ROSEWOOD study.A GMI of 1.33 was used as a threshold for significant clinical activity.Results: In the overall population, median GMI was 2.7 (95% CI 1.6-4.9) in the ZO arm and 0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.7) in the O arm.Analysis in subgroups of clinical interest in the ZO arm showed that PFS was longer with ZO than with the last prior treatment, and median GMI was 1.33 in all subgroups tested.Overall, PFS had improved (GMI 1.33) in >60% of patients with R/R FL who received ZO versus their last prior treatment.Conclusions: This GMI analysis further supports the benefit of ZO as a novel therapeutic option for patients with R/R FL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trotman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf59635a333a8214609faahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106942
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of the relevance of the growth modulation index (GMI) from the FFCD 0307 randomized phase III trial comparing the sequence of two chemotherapeutic regimens2023 · 6 citations
  2. 2ROSEWOOD: A Phase II Randomized Study of Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma2023 · 105 citations
  3. 3Efficacy and safety of idelalisib in patients with relapsed, rituximab- and alkylating agent-refractory follicular lymphoma: a subgroup analysis of a phase 2 study2016 · 73 citations
  4. 4Second‐line and subsequent therapy and outcomes for follicular lymphoma in the United States: data from the observational National LymphoCare Study2018 · 98 citations
  5. 5Growth modulation index as metric of clinical benefit assessment among advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving trabectedin as a salvage therapy2012 · 54 citations