PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Societies2 citationsOpen Access

Ctrl + Alt + Remedy? Child Rights, Access to Justice and Preventive Responses to Cyberbullying in the European Union

EKEnikő Kovács-SzépvölgyiBMBrigitta MolnárBSBernadett Szakács

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine how EU Member States address cyberbullying with a focus on child rights and legal measures.
  • Utilized qualitative, document-based comparative methodology.
  • Applied a harmonized codebook to analyze responses across EU Member States.
  • Grounded analysis in EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and relevant initiatives.
  • Aggregated findings into a composite structural indicator.
  • Most Member States demonstrate strong regulatory attention to cyberbullying.
  • Legal protections generally focus on criminal law, educational efforts, and reporting mechanisms.
  • Child-specific elements, such as clear definitions and tailored remedies, are lacking.
  • Significant gaps exist in the integration of child-centered justice mechanisms.

Abstract

This study examines how European Union Member States address cyberbullying affecting children through legal and policy frameworks, paying particular attention to children’s rights. It employs a qualitative, document-based comparative methodology, applying a harmonized codebook to analyze definitional, legal, preventive, and reactive responses across all 27 EU Member States. The analytical framework is grounded in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child, the Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) initiative, and the Digital Services Act, which serve as normative benchmarks. Coding draws on EU-level harmonized sources, including Joint Research Centre outputs and the 2025 BIK policy reports, and aggregates the findings into a composite structural indicator capturing the formal regulatory and policy coverage of cyberbullying from a child rights perspective. The results indicate a high level of formal regulatory attention in most Member States, particularly regarding criminal law protection, educational prevention, and institutional reporting mechanisms. However, child-specific and child-friendly elements—such as explicit cyberbullying definitions, adapted reporting procedures, and tailored civil law remedies—remain uneven and limited. The study concludes that, despite comprehensive formal regulation, significant gaps persist in the integration of child-centered and access-to-justice-oriented mechanisms, underscoring the need for strengthened child rights approaches and further research on implementation and children’s lived experiences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kovács-Szépvölgyi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ced5a333a821460a747https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16040116
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper