PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle3 citationsOpen Access

Automated CT‐Based Muscle Density Predicts Mortality Regardless of Muscle Area

View Full Paper
AKAdam J. KuchniaGBGlen M. BlakeMLMinjung Lee

Key Points

  • To evaluate if muscle area and muscle density from CT scans can predict long-term survival in adults.
  • Retrospective analysis of 151,141 adults with abdominal CT scans from 2000 to 2021.
  • Used an AI-based algorithm to measure L3-level muscle area and density in Hounsfield units.
  • Extracted demographic and clinical data from electronic health records for survival analysis.
  • 138,535 adults were analyzed; 28,489 deaths occurred over 20 years, resulting in a 20-year survival rate of 0.620.
  • Lower muscle density was linked to higher mortality risk, with hazard ratios up to 4.0 in men and 3.5 in women.
  • High muscle density correlated with better survival, while low muscle density significantly predicted mortality across all ages and sexes.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Abdominal CT‐based assessments of skeletal muscle may provide important prognostic information for all‐cause mortality in aging adults. We aimed to evaluate whether AI‐segmented muscle area and muscle density predict long‐term survival in a large, retrospective adult population. Methods This retrospective study included 151 141 adult patients who underwent an abdominal CT examination for any indication between 2000 and 2021. A validated automated AI‐based algorithm measured L3‐level muscle area (cm 2 ) and muscle density in Hounsfield units (HU). Demographic and clinical data (age, sex, BMI and date of death) were extracted from electronic health records. Survival analyses included Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable hazard ratio (HR) models to determine the relationship between these muscle metrics and mortality. Results Among the 138 535 adults (66 468 men and 72 067 women) included, 28 489 died over the 20‐year period post‐CT, yielding an overall 20‐year survival rate of 0.620 (95% CI: 0.611–0.629). Of these, 9343 deaths occurred within the first year survival rate: 0.933 (95% CI: 0.932–0.934). Mean and median follow‐up time was 6.4 and 4.9 years, respectively. Lower muscle density significantly predicted higher mortality when each patient's measurement was expressed by its percentile within the age and sex‐matched population (HR up to 3.5 in women and 4.0 in men), with decreasing mortality throughout the higher percentiles. Lower muscle area showed a more modest effect on mortality in both sexes when expressed in percentiles. Individuals with high muscle density demonstrated the most favourable survival and those with low density demonstrated the worst survival. Low muscle density significantly predicted mortality across all age groups and both sexes. Conversely, muscle area predicted mortality in all age groups in men, albeit to a lesser degree and did not predict mortality in any age group among women. Conclusions Automated CT‐based measurements of muscle density are superior to muscle area in predicting all‐cause mortality in a large, heterogeneous adult population. Incorporating AI‐driven muscle density assessments into routine clinical practice could substantially improve patient risk stratification and management, of particular relevance for aging and sarcopenic patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kuchnia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5d885a333a821460b5eahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.70268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper