The rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC®) is a known model for research in rumen microbiology and fermentation. However, our research group observed inconsistencies in gas production across trials. This study investigated the effects of different gas outlet locations on digestibility, ruminal fermentation, gas production, and microbial protein synthesis. Fifteen fermenters tested three different gas outlet locations within the RUSITEC® equipment: (1) gas outlet directly on the effluent vessel for output liquid (EV); (2) gas outlet directly on fermenter cap (F); and (3) gas outlet on both effluent vessel and fermenter cap (EVF). Data were analyzed using a completely randomized design in SAS (v. 9.4) with the MIXED procedure, and significance was set at p 0.10), microbial protein synthesis (p > 0.10), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production when expressed on a molar basis (p > 0.10). However, total gas production (p = 0.108) was higher in the EVF group and ammonia nitrogen produced in the fermenter was higher in group F (p = 0.081). Furthermore, methane (CH4) production was underestimated when the gas outlet location was in just one of the locations when compared to the EVF group (p = 0.006). VFA proportion was also affected, with lower acetate (p = 0.005) and higher butyrate (p = 0.014) for group EV. These results indicate that the location of the gas outlet is an important methodological factor affecting fermentation measurements in the RUSITEC system, with outlets positioned in both the effluent and fermenter vessels enhancing gas recovery.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.