PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Journal of Robotic Surgery2 citationsOpen Access

Perioperative outcomes and safety of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) for anatomic lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SKSuha KaakiABAnas Bassam BarnawiHRHassan Robaidi

Key Result

Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomic lung resection demonstrated a low pooled conversion rate of 1.34% and a postoperative morbidity rate of 5.99%.

Key Points

  • This study aims to clarify the perioperative safety and outcomes of Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) for lung resection.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies.
  • Included primary outcomes such as conversion rate, morbidity, and mortality.
  • Utilized random-effects models to pool estimates from included studies.
  • Pooled conversion rate was 1.34% with no heterogeneity observed.
  • Pooled postoperative morbidity rate was 5.99%.
  • Pooled mortality rate was 0.21%.
  • Mean operative time was 171.3 minutes with estimated blood loss at 51.9 mL.
  • Pooled lymph node yield was 16.6 nodes across 11 studies.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=579)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) provide safe perioperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing anatomic lung resection?

P
Population
579 adult patients undergoing anatomic lung resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) pooled from 16 studies.
I
Intervention
Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) using platforms such as Da Vinci Xi, Da Vinci SP, or SHURUI.
O
Outcome
Conversion rate, morbidity, and mortalitysafety

U-RATS is a safe and feasible approach for anatomic lung resection, demonstrating low perioperative conversion, morbidity, and mortality rates.

Limitations

  • Reliance on retrospective studies and small prospective series
  • Data mainly from high-volume centers, which may hinder generalizability
  • Lack of long-term oncologic data such as survival and recurrence rates
  • Inconsistent reporting of lymph node stations and resection margin status
  • Absence of randomized trials
  • High heterogeneity for operative time and length of stay
  • Potential publication bias or small-study effects for morbidity rate
  • Small sample sizes in some included studies

Abstract

Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS) represents a recent evolution in minimally invasive lung resection, combining the single-incision philosophy with robotic technology. However, its perioperative safety and outcomes have not been clearly defined across published studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a registered protocol. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting perioperative outcomes of U-RATS for anatomic lung resection in adults. Primary outcomes included conversion rate, morbidity, and mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and lymph node yield. Random-effects models were applied to pool estimates. Sixteen studies encompassing 579 patients were included. The pooled conversion rate was 1.34% (95% CI: 0.42–4.15%), with no observed heterogeneity. The pooled postoperative morbidity rate was 5.99% (95% CI: 4.46–7.91%), and the pooled mortality rate was 0.21% (95% CI: 0.07–0.64%). The pooled mean operative time was 171.3 min, the estimated blood loss was 51.9 mL, and the postoperative length of stay was 4.9 days. Across 11 studies, the pooled lymph node yield was 16.6 nodes (95% CI: 14.0–19.2; I² = 89.8%). Current evidence suggests that U-RATS is a safe and feasible approach for anatomic lung resection, with low conversion and complication rates and acceptable perioperative outcomes comparable to established minimally invasive techniques.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaaki et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Anatomic lung resection (n=579). Uniportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (U-RATS) was evaluated on Conversion rate (95% CI 0.42-4.15%). Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomic lung resection demonstrated a low pooled conversion rate of 1.34% and a postoperative morbidity rate of 5.99%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e115a333a821460c2d4https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03349-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper