PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026ACS Omega2 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Ethanol-Gasoline Blending on Combustion, Performance, and Emissions of a Spark Ignition Engine: An Experimental and Detailed Chemistry-Based Numerical Study

View Full Paper
AKAlaa M. KhedrMIMhadi A. IsmaelMEMohammed El-Adawy

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effects of ethanol blending on combustion characteristics, performance, and emissions in spark ignition engines.
  • Experimental investigation in a single-cylinder spark ignition engine.
  • Utilization of a global single-step reaction model and detailed chemical mechanism for numerical simulations.
  • Constant compression ratio of 9 and engine speed of 1500 rpm maintained during experiments.
  • Blending ethanol in various ratios, with a focus on E30 and E60 for performance analysis.
  • E30 blend enhances combustion quality, showing increased in-cylinder pressures and improved indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP).
  • Ethanol concentrations above E40 resulted in combustion instability and reduced efficiency.
  • E30 exhibited the lowest specific fuel consumption of 380 g/kWh and the highest thermal efficiency of 34.5%.
  • E60 blend achieved reductions in emissions: CO2 by 16%, CO by 27%, NOx by 38%, and unburned hydrocarbons by 57% compared to pure gasoline.

Abstract

This study investigates experimentally and numerically the impact of e-ethanol drop-in on combustion, performance, and emission metrics in a single-cylinder spark ignition engine. Experiments were conducted at a constant compression ratio of 9, 75% throttle, engine speed of 1500 rpm, equivalence ratio of 0.81, and fixed ignition timing of 25 °CAD BTDC. Numerical simulations utilizing both a global single-step reaction model for pure gasoline (G100) and a detailed chemical mechanism for G100 and different ethanol blends provided accurate predictions of combustion trends. Blending ethanol up to 30% by volume (E30) enhances combustion quality, as evidenced by increased in-cylinder pressures and improved IMEP. However, ethanol concentrations beyond E40 led to combustion instability and significant losses in pressure and efficiency due to suboptimal combustion phasing supported by lower heating value. The analyses of the thermal and flow fields revealed consistent intake-induced tumble motion and similar in-cylinder velocity structures for E100 and G100, regardless of the blend ratio. E30 offered the lowest indicated specific fuel consumption of 380 g/kWh and the highest indicated thermal efficiency (ηth, I) of 34.5%. Emission trends favored ethanol addition, with reductions in CO2 by 16%, CO by 27%, NOx by 38%, and unburned hydrocarbons by 57% for E60 in comparison with G100 attributing to ethanol’s oxygenation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khedr et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e5f5a333a821460cb55https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c13094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper