PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Atmosphere0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation and Setup of a High-Resolution Regional Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model for Hindcasting Tropical Cyclones in the North Atlantic Ocean Basin

View Full Paper
MZM. Zapata-HenaoCHCarlos D. HoyosYCYuley Cardona

Key Points

  • The study aims to set up and evaluate a high-resolution model for simulating tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic.
  • Combined Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) and Coastal and Regional Ocean Community (CROCO) models
  • Achieved spatial resolutions of 9 km and 18 km, respectively
  • Simulated a hindcast ensemble of 15 historical tropical cyclones
  • Utilized an automated detection algorithm for TC tracks and intensities
  • Compared simulated data with observational data from International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS)
  • Coupled model demonstrated good performance in simulating TC trajectories
  • Mean distance error for TC centers was 176 km
  • Median intensity difference was 6.4%, slightly overestimating intensity
  • High accuracy for specific storms like Dennis (2005) and Fiona (2022), but larger errors for storms like Eta (2020)
  • Identified computational expense and sensitivity to model configurations as limitations

Abstract

This paper presents the setup and evaluation of a high-resolution, regional, coupled ocean–atmosphere model to simulate tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic Basin. This approach combines the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) atmospheric model and the Coastal and Regional Ocean Community (CROCO), featuring spatial resolutions of 9 km and 18 km, respectively, which are coupled through OASIS-MCT. A hindcast ensemble of 15 historical TCs was simulated using both the coupled and uncoupled model configurations. TC tracks and intensities were extracted using an automated detection algorithm and compared with observational data from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS). The coupled model showed good overall performance in representing TC trajectories and intensity changes. The mean distance error between the simulated and observed TCs centers was 176 km. The median intensity difference was 6.4% with a tendency to slightly overestimate TC intensity. Performance varied across storms, with cases such as Dennis (2005) and Fiona (2022) simulated with relatively high accuracy, while others, including Eta (2020), exhibited larger errors. This coupled modeling system provides a promising tool for studying ocean–atmosphere interactions during TCs and for generating high-resolution 3D data for both the ocean and atmosphere. However, the limitations include computational expense and sensitivity to the model configuration choices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zapata-Henao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ea85a333a821460d1f3https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper