PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

From Tate Uniformization to Rademacher Growth: Weight -12, Boundary Normalization, and a Holographic Dictionary

View Full Paper
CYChihiro Yokota

Key Points

  • To explore the mathematical connections between weight -12 models, Tate uniformization, and Rademacher growth behaviors.
  • Studied a weight -12 modular model based on the Tate curve and its discriminant.
  • Formulated $q^{\mathbb Z}$-periodization using a restricted operator $ Theta_q$.
  • Analyzed convergence behavior and established explicit Neumann inverses for a class of kernels.
  • Used the exact Rademacher expansion of $1/\Delta$ to derive an asymptotic formula.
  • Identified a controlled Tate-normalized uniformization package.
  • Derived the asymptotic behavior of $c(n)$ for the dominant Hardy--Ramanujan form.
  • Presented a mathematical interpretation of boundary data in relation to bulk growth using a holographic framework.

Abstract

Abstract: We study a weight--12 modular/arithmetic model centered on the Tate curve, the discriminant, and the exact Rademacher expansion of 1/. On the Tate side, we formulate q^ Z-periodization through a restricted operator q, emphasize that two-sided periodization is not convergent for general analytic input, and isolate a concrete class of kernels for which stagewise convergence, explicit Neumann inverses, and Newton--Hensel local inversion hold on affinoid domains avoiding the poles. This yields a controlled Tate-normalized local uniformization package together with a conditional comparison between the pullback of the invariant differential and the unit-derivative criterion. On the modular side, we recall that the same normalization forces the appearance of the weight-12 cusp form, and we use the exact Rademacher formula for 1/ to obtain the dominant Hardy--Ramanujan asymptotic \ c (n) 1 2 (n+1) ^-27/4e^4+1. \ We then interpret the Bessel kernel and Kloosterman phases as a structural ``holographic'' dictionary between boundary data and bulk growth. The point is not to claim a literal AdS₃/CFT₂ duality, but to exhibit a mathematically precise weight--12 model in which Tate uniformization, boundary normalization, exact coefficient reconstruction, and residual torsion/phase data fit into a common framework. Contact & Feedback: This upload is a research preprint and part of an ongoing independent research program. Comments, corrections, questions, and discussions are highly welcome. As I pursue this work independently alongside my regular professional commitments, my replies may take some time and are typically sent during weekends or holidays. Thank you for your understanding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chihiro Yokota (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ea85a333a821460d3aehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19343137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper