PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026PLoS Biology2 citationsOpen Access

Evidence for genetically-based sperm discrimination in the vaginal tract of a primate species

View Full Paper
RPRachel M. PetersenLNLee NonnamakerJAJaclyn A. Anderson

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how female physiology, particularly vaginal responses, is influenced by male genetic factors during sperm competition.
  • Examined the vaginal immune response and pH in olive baboons
  • Conducted tests among nine females and four males
  • Analyzed correlations between female physiological responses and male genetic similarity
  • Females showed stronger immune responses when mating with genetically similar males
  • Largest decreases in vaginal pH, detrimental to sperm survival, occurred with these genetic matches
  • Evidence supports the theory of post-copulatory mate discrimination based on genetic similarity

Abstract

Females influence offspring paternity through diverse pre- and post-copulatory mechanisms. Sperm discrimination-the differential physiological response to ejaculates based on male or sperm characteristics-can bias fertilization outcomes, but in vivo evidence of this process in large-bodied mammals is lacking. Here, in a study of nine females and four males, we tested whether two aspects of female physiology that affect sperm survival-vaginal immune response and pH-are modulated by male genetic makeup in a non-human primate, the olive baboon (Papio anubis). Our findings suggest post-copulatory differences in vaginal gene expression and pH, with the strongest immune responses and largest pH decreases, harmful to sperm, exhibited by females mating with genetically similar males. These findings are consistent with genetically-based post-copulatory mate discrimination, offering new insights into how interactions between male gametes and the female reproductive tract may shape conception probability in primates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Petersen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5ebc5a333a821460d49ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003699
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper