PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Numerical investigation of shock wave interactions with square barrier–end wall systems

MGManav Guzraty

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how shock waves interact with square barrier-end wall systems, focusing on the resultant forces and impulses.
  • Numerically solve Euler equations for flow dynamics in two- and three-dimensional domains
  • Visualize flow properties like density gradient, vorticity, and Q-criterion
  • Evaluate force and impulse on the end wall based on different barrier configurations
  • Force and impulse on the end wall are significantly amplified with barrier coverage
  • Amplification results from trapped shocklets and vortex rings interacting
  • Complex shock-vortex interactions are observed, affecting the overall dynamics

Abstract

Protective barriers have been used to deflect the shock waves produced by blasts away from potential targets in military, aerospace, and civil infrastructure. The force and impulse imparted on the target (end wall) are closely linked to the reflections, diffraction, and reverberations of shocks in the barrier-end wall system. This study focuses on numerically solving the Euler equations for the flow field and end wall dynamics developed when an incident normal shock interacts with a square (or cube) barrier-end wall system in two- and three-dimensional domains. Visualizations of various quantities like density gradient, vorticity magnitude, Qcriterion, etc. were produced for a set of barrier coverage and separation values to examine the flow field, along with evaluation of force and impulse on the end wall. Force and impulse are found to be amplified compared to the absence of coverage for the set of parameters present. The amplification results from shocklets that reverberate in the barrier-end wall pocket. The reverberating shocklets are further trapped by vortex rings formed around the barrier, giving rise to complex shockvortex interactions. These results can further support the case for using CFD to optimize barrier placement and coverage and inform additional analyses that rely on the flow physics of the system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Manav Guzraty (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5eee5a333a821460db50https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-a24s-5c40
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modelling the impact of a dam‐break wave on a vertical wall2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Shockwave attenuation characteristics of rapid-assembly anti-blast walls under explosive load2026
  3. 3Protection Capability of Different Types of Barricades Against Blast Pressure2025
  4. 4A far-field blast loads high-fidelity numerical simulation after considering concepts from the defense simulation domain2026
  5. 5Experiments on Fluid-Structure Coupling Under Impinging Shock Wave Loading2026