PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Frame Constitution and Identity Tolerance: The Determination of δF in La Profilée

View Full Paper
MMMarc Maibom

Key Points

  • The aim is to clarify how to determine the identity tolerance (δ_F) within frame constitution.
  • Dissections the concepts of F_constitutive and F_operational
  • Applies theoretical frameworks to derive δ_F
  • Explores structural relationships within the Frame
  • Identifies δ_F as a system-relative value rather than a fixed standard
  • Defines δ_F as the maximum permissible displacement of F_operational while maintaining F_constitutive
  • Extends the measurement program of Frame theory to address the identity aspect

Abstract

Paper 57 established the Frame Continuity Condition (FCC) as the identity complement to LP’s existence condition IR ≤ 1. FCC requires that Frame drift from origin does not exceed identity tolerance δF. The present paper addresses the determination of δF. We argue that δF is neither empirically stipulated nor universally fixed, but structurally derived from a distinction internal to Frame itself: Fconstitutive, the identity-bearing core of the Frame, and Fₒperational, its variable expression. δF is the maximal displacement of Fₒperational compatible with Fconstitutive remaining intact. This derivation makes δF system-relative without making it arbitrary, and operational without requiring external calibration. The result extends LP’s measurement program to the identity dimension and closes the determination problem opened by FCC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5f105a333a821460ddfchttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19359901
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper