PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026JACOW0 citationsOpen Access

CRISTALLINA-Q XFEL Diffractometers

View Full Paper
GOGheorghe OleaNHNorman HuberRSRudolf Schneider

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop advanced diffractometers for studying quantum materials under extreme conditions.
  • Developed two specialized diffractometers (CrQ-Dm1 and CrQ-Dm2) for heavy load precision measurements.
  • Utilized extreme conditions (temperature, pressure, radiation) to perform investigations.
  • Conducted simulations and precision tests to ensure compatibility and functionality of diffractometers.
  • CrQ-Dm1 operates with a large-size cryo-magnet, while CrQ-Dm2 uses a smaller pulse-magnet.
  • Both diffractometers enable horizontal scattering investigations and offer high versatility.
  • Challenges and results from tests indicate their effectiveness in advancing quantum materials research.

Abstract

In a well-known European free-electron laser facility (SwissFEL) *, a new branch (ARAMIS 3) of the beam line delivers hard X-ray to the CRISTALLINA experimental hutch. CRISTALINA-Q station inside, intends to investigate advanced materials focused on specific Quantum materials (QM) structures and processes. Two new heavy load dedicated Diffractometers (Dm) ** have been developed. They are heavy load precision machines which, through adequate techniques and instruments, under extreme conditions (temp, press, rad), working in tandem are expected to fastly advance the investigations. The first (CrQ-Dm1) is manipulating a large-size (h=2. 5m) cryo-magnet (1t, 5. 2T, -10mK) and the second one (CrQ-Dm2) a smaller pulse-magnet (0. 6t, 50T, 30 rate) sample instruments. They are able to perform most of the investigations in horizontal scattering, but not only. From flexibility and versatility reasons, Dm (s) have been conceived with similar configurations, having each a high level of compatibility inside & outside, however exhibiting some distinct differences. The kinematic, design, simulations and precision principles applied, together with challenging aspects and results of tests are presented.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Olea et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aeb9659487ece0fa4a4dhttps://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-medsi2025-tup16
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The new ALBA diffractometer for microfocus beam macromolecular crystallography experiments at XAIRA beamline2026
  2. 2Crystallographic Data Collection Using a Multilayer Monochromator on an Undulator Beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3New opportunities for high pressure X-ray absorption spectroscopy at ID24-DCM and BM23 with the Extremely Brilliant Source of the ESRF2024 · 19 citations
  4. 4Developing time-resolved x-ray diffraction diagnostics at the National Ignition Facility (invited)2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5High-throughput and high-resolution powder X-ray diffractometer consisting of six sets of 2D CdTe detectors with variable sample-to-detector distance and innovative automation system2024 · 34 citations