PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Canadian Geotechnical Journal0 citations

Mechanical behavior and crack evolution mechanism of layered cracked rock samples reinforced by grouting-anchor bolt

View Full Paper
ZXZhiguo XiaUniversity of Science and Technology LiaoningJWJunbo WangUniversity of Science and Technology LiaoningHWHukun WangUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing

Key Points

  • To investigate the mechanical behavior and crack evolution in layered cracked rock samples with different reinforcement techniques.
  • Conducted uniaxial compression tests on rock-like specimens with varying crack lengths.
  • Applied bolt reinforcement and grouting–bolt synergistic reinforcement techniques.
  • Employed acoustic emission monitoring and high-speed imaging to analyze mechanical responses.
  • Peak strength and elastic modulus decline linearly with increased crack length for both reinforcement types.
  • Grouting–bolt reinforcement significantly improves stability and bearing capacity under long-crack conditions.
  • Bolt-reinforced specimens show through-going cracks, while the grouting–bolt group exhibits dispersed crack initiation and delayed coalescence.

Abstract

Crack defects and layered structures critically affect the stability of rock engineering, and effective reinforcement is essential to maintain structural integrity. In this study, uniaxial compression tests were performed on layered rock-like specimens with different crack lengths using bolt reinforcement and grouting–bolt synergistic reinforcement. Acoustic emission (AE) monitoring and high-speed imaging were employed to analyze mechanical response and crack evolution.Results indicate that peak strength and elastic modulus decrease linearly with increasing crack length for both reinforcement methods. However, grouting–bolt synergistic reinforcement significantly mitigates this degradation and preserves higher bearing capacity under long-crack conditions. Bolt-reinforced specimens tend to develop through-going cracks at crack tips and bedding interfaces. In contrast, the grouting–bolt group exhibits more dispersed crack initiation, increased crack numbers, and delayed crack coalescence.AE analysis shows that the bolt group experiences earlier high-energy events before peak stress, with a rapid rise in cumulative energy and a pronounced decline in the b-value. The grouting–bolt group displays concentrated high-energy events near or after peak stress and a slower b-value reduction, indicating weakened crack localization. Multi-parameter coupling reveals that synergistic reinforcement enhances interfacial load transfer and modifies energy dissipation paths, thereby suppressing long-crack-induced instability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aefd659487ece0fa4d5dhttps://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-1003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper