PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026World0 citationsOpen Access

Trade Liberalization Under SAFTA and BIMSTEC: Evidence from a CGE-GTAP Case Study of a Small Open Economy

View Full Paper
GBGita BhushalPLPankaj Lal

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the economic impacts of tariff and non-tariff reforms under SAFTA and BIMSTEC.
  • Applied a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model calibrated with the GTAP 10 database.
  • Integrated gravity-based estimates of ad valorem equivalents (AVEs) of non-tariff measures into the CGE framework.
  • Conducted policy simulations involving varying levels of tariff and NTM reductions.
  • Combined liberalization resulted in approximately a 1% increase in real GDP.
  • Exports increased by over 14%, with significant growth seen in the manufacturing sector, especially textiles.
  • Agricultural responses varied depending on exposure to non-tariff measures.

Abstract

Regional trade liberalization via preferential agreements increasingly shapes economic outcomes in small open economies embedded in overlapping regional frameworks. This study evaluates the short-run economy-wide effects of tariff and non-tariff measure (NTM) reforms under the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model calibrated to the GTAP 10 database. Gravity-based estimates of ad valorem equivalents (AVEs) of NTMs are integrated into the CGE framework, enabling explicit modeling of regulatory barriers alongside tariff reductions. Policy simulations examine scenarios involving a 90 percent tariff cut and a 50 percent NTM reduction, applied individually and jointly, under a short-run closure with fixed factor endowments and a trade balance for Nepal. Results indicate that combined liberalization yields positive macroeconomic adjustments, with real GDP rising by about one percent and exports increasing by over 14 percent, driven primarily by the manufacturing sector, particularly textiles, while agricultural responses vary by exposure to NTMs. These findings provide policy-relevant evidence on the relative effectiveness of tariff and regulatory reforms, informing strategies for deeper regional integration and enhanced competitiveness in small, structurally constrained economies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhushal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aefd659487ece0fa4d8ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/world7040056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1wl-6822-Deeper Trade Integration among South Asian and Southeast Asian Regions2025
  2. 2Assessing Trade Creation and Diversion Effects in India’s SAFTA Engagement: A Gravity Model Approach2026
  3. 3Determinants of Nepal's Bilateral Trade in the SAARC Region: A Gravity Model Approach using PPML Estimator2025
  4. 4Trade Agreements and Export Performance of Bangladesh: A Gravity Model Analysis2025
  5. 5Revolutionising Indian Agriculture Exports: Unpacking the Transformative Impact of South Asian Free Trade Agreement2025