PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research0 citations

Numerical Simulations of Nanoparticle Fluidization under Pulsation Assistance Using PBM with a Mechanistically Grounded Gas Shear Breakage Kernel: Model Validation and Mechanistic Insights

View Full Paper
JYJinglu YanHarbin Institute of TechnologySWShaowei WangHenan University of Science and TechnologyJCJiahao ChenQilu University of Technology

Key Points

  • This study aims to enhance predictions of nanoparticle fluidization under pulsation assistance and understand the mechanisms involved.
  • Developed a gas shear breakage kernel based on an outer-layer stripping mechanism.
  • Incorporated modified agglomerate-phase constitutive equations within the kinetic theory of cohesive particle flow.
  • Utilized a CFD-KTCPF-PBM coupling method to simulate pulse-assisted fluidization.
  • Validated the model against experimental data.
  • Achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 5.00% and a root-mean-square error of 0.16, significantly reducing prediction errors.
  • Simulations reproduced typical behaviors of agglomerate particulate fluidization regimes.
  • Pulsation improved fluidization quality by increasing bed expansion and enhancing gas-solid mixing.

Abstract

Gas pulsation significantly improves nanoparticle fluidization quality and facilitates industrial scale-up. However, accurate prediction of pulse-assisted fluidization and understanding of how intermittent gas flow regulates agglomerate breakage-agglomeration dynamic equilibrium remain challenging. Here, a gas shear breakage kernel based on an outer-layer stripping mechanism is proposed and incorporated into the population balance model (PBM). To account for agglomerate size evolution in interagglomerate interactions and energy dissipation, agglomerate-phase constitutive equations are modified within the kinetic theory of cohesive particle flow (KTCPF). A CFD-KTCPF-PBM coupling method is then developed to simulate pulse-assisted nanoparticle fluidization. Model validation against experimental data shows markedly improved prediction accuracy, with the mean absolute percentage error and root-mean-square error reduced to 5.00% and 0.16, representing reductions of 17.1-fold and 20.8-fold relative to the conventional method. Simulations reproduce typical behaviors in the agglomerate particulate fluidization regime. The pulsation-induced improvement in fluidization quality can be interpreted as an equivalent effect of increased gas velocity. By inducing periodic global circulation and dispersed local circulations, gas pulsation suppresses bottom accumulation and promotes bed expansion and gas–solid mixing. This regulation essentially reshapes bed dynamics, transitioning the fluidization from low-efficiency, ordered, and stratified to high-efficiency, chaotic, and intensely mixed regimes. This study provides a validated high-accuracy predictive tool and theoretical basis for nanoparticle pulsed fluidization and its industrial scale-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af36659487ece0fa51b1https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c05330
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Van der Waals Forces between Particles and Surfaces2011 · 103 citations
  2. 2Observation of Soot Superaggregates with a Fractal Dimension of 2.6 in Laminar Acetylene/Air Diffusion Flames2003 · 63 citations
  3. 3Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels1985 · 221 citations
  4. 4On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds1956 · 1,461 citations
  5. 5Numerical simulation of flow behavior of agglomerates in gas–cohesive particles fluidized beds using agglomerates-based approach2009 · 35 citations