PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Comparative Philosophy An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy1 citationsOpen Access

Moral and Ethical Nature in Confucian Liang-Zhi and Islamic Fitra: Comparative Perspectives on Innate Morality

YSYanrong SHI

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze and compare the innate moral concepts of liang-zhi in Confucianism and fitra in Islam.
  • Conducted a comparative philosophical analysis based on classical Confucian texts and foundational Islamic sources.
  • Focused on Wang Yangming's interpretation of liang-zhi and relevant Islamic commentary as a basis for the study.
  • Examined the implications of both frameworks for universal ethics and moral responsibility.
  • Identified a shared belief in an inborn moral faculty across both traditions.
  • Demonstrated that liang-zhi and fitra reflect an optimistic view of human moral capacity.
  • Highlighted the rejection of original depravity in both Confucian and Islamic philosophies.

Abstract

This article offers a comparative philosophical analysis of Confucian liang-zhi (innate moral knowledge) and Islamic fitra(primordial nature), focusing on their accounts of innate morality and moral epistemology. Drawing on classical Confucian sources—especially the praxis-oriented interpretation of Wang Yangming—and foundational Islamic texts and commentary, the study demonstrates that both traditions posit an inborn moral faculty grounding ethical universality and responsibility. Wang Yangming’s liang-zhi is conceived as an innate moral principle that, under the imperative of zhi (to actualize or extend), is continually activated through moral practice. In parallel, fitra is understood as a God-given orientation to truth, cultivated and safeguarded through revelation and ethical discipline. Despite differing theological frameworks, both doctrines converge on an optimistic view of human moral potential and reject the notion of original depravity. This comparison not only clarifies the distinctive metaphysical commitments of each tradition, but also illuminates how non-Western philosophies articulate universalist ethics, offering new perspectives for cross-cultural moral discourse and the renewal of contemporary moral philosophy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yanrong SHI (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0af83659487ece0fa5702https://doi.org/10.55917/2151-6014.1809
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper