PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The International Law Reading of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

CSCarlo de Stefano

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the compatibility of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism with international law, focusing on trade and environmental regulations.
  • Assessment of CBAM against international trade law standards, particularly WTO regulations.
  • Analysis of the mechanism's compliance with international environmental law, including the climate change regime.
  • Evaluation of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities in the context of CBAM.
  • CBAM is largely compatible with WTO regulations, aiding in EU climate leadership.
  • The mechanism inadequately addresses common but differentiated responsibilities, impacting its fairness.
  • Introducing special treatment for least developed countries could enhance the legitimacy of EU climate initiatives.

Abstract

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), established by Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of 10 May 2023, aims to realise the EU climate ambition and leadership primarily by preventing the risk of carbon leakage in furtherance of the goals of the Paris Agreement of 12 December 2015. This also entails promoting decarbonisation in third countries, including in newly industrialized countries that may be still categorized as developing. This article provides an assessment of the legality of the CBAM under international law, namely pursuant to international trade law, especially the law of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and international environmental law, notably under the international climate change regime (ICCR). This article highlights that the CBAM, while being overall WTO compatible, fails to adequately address the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) that is cardinal within the ICCR. In this respect, the introduction of differential treatment in favour of least developed countries (LDCs) would strengthen the legitimacy of the European climate ambition and leadership.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carlo de Stefano (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0afc7659487ece0fa5cb1https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/869
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper