PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

Effect of Supplement Type, Season and Breed on Pre-weaning Lamb Performance in Landrace Hair Sheep in a Pasture-based Accelerated Mating System

View Full Paper
SWS. WildeusDODahlia O'BrienKMKwame Matthews

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine how supplement type, season, and breed affect the growth and fitness of pre-weaning lambs in a pasture-based system.
  • Compared soy hull and corn-based supplements for ewes during late pregnancy and lactation.
  • Measured lamb birth and weaning weights, fecal egg counts, packed cell volume, and body condition.
  • Analyzed growth performance data with respect to breeding season and breed of lambs.
  • Lambs with corn-based supplements had higher weaning weights and average daily gains.
  • Mating season significantly affected lamb weights, with April-born lambs being the heaviest.
  • Soy hull supplementation showed improved lamb survival to weaning despite reduced growth.

Abstract

Abstract Pasture-based sheep production may require supplementation during periods of reduced forage quality and quantity, and periods of high nutritional demands. This experiment compared soy hull to a more traditional corn-based supplement for hair sheep ewes managed in a pasture-based accelerated mating system. Growth performance and fitness of the lambs was evaluated. Ewes (Barbados Blackbelly and St. Croix; 30 -36 per season) were bred in March, July, and November in 25-d breeding seasons in two single-sire groups to like breed sires, and subsequently managed as one group. Pregnant ewes (30-36 per season) were allocated balanced by breed, parity and fetal numbers to either corn/soybean meal (CS) or soy hull (SH) supplementation starting the last trimester. Ewes were supplemented at either 0.75% BW (gestation) or 1.5% BW (lactation). Ewes rotationally grazed or were provided hay on pastures divided into 6 sections (0.13 ha; 3 sections of 5 - 6 ewes per supplement type). Lambs were born on pasture, had access to the supplement provided to their dams and were weaned around 9 wk. Lamb birth and weaning weights were recorded, and fecal egg counts (FEC), packed cell volume (PCV), and body condition (BC) were determined at weaning. Data (n = 175) were analyzed in a model with supplement type, mating season, breed, sex, and birth type as main effects. FEC were log-transformed before analysis (means reported). Lambs with access to the CS tended (P 0.1) to have a higher 60-d adjusted weaning weight (11.8 vs. 11.5 kg), pre-weaning ADG (148 vs. 135 g/d), and BC (1.82 vs. 1.64) compared to SH lambs. There was no effect of supplement type on FEC and PCV. Mating season had a significant P 0.01) effect on lamb weaning weight (April: 12.4 kg; August: 11.4 kg; December: 10.5 kg) and pre-weaning growth and ADG was higher (P 0.001) in April-born (155 g/d) compared to December-born lambs (126 g/d), with August-born lambs being intermediate (144 g/d). There was a supplement type x season interaction (P 0.05) for weaning weight and ADG with lower growth performance in SH-supplemented lambs in July, and increased growth in CS-supplemented lambs in November. Lamb survival to weaning tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in SH-supplemented (92.1%) than CS-supplemented (83.7%) lambs. There was no effect of season on BC, FEC, and PCV. St. Croix lambs had higher (P 0.05) birth and weaning weights, but not pre-weaning ADG than Barbados Blackbelly lambs, and lower PCV (P 0.05). There was no effect of breed on FEC. The season by supplement type interaction suggested an influence of forage environment on the supplementation response. Soy hull supplementation caused a nominal reduction in pre-weaning growth of lambs, but improved in lamb survival and presents a viable supplement in a forage-based production system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wildeus et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0afc7659487ece0fa5cb8https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag057.098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper