Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by retail traders to interpret information and design complex strategies, yet existing adoption constructs do not capture the decision-time experience of being cognitively scaffolded by an LLM. We define Perceived Cognitive Assistance (PCA) as the trader’s felt expansion of cognitive capability at the moment of a trading decision when an LLM is available, and we report initial content validation of a PCA item pool. Study 1 specified the PCA content domain using a two-tier qualitative corpus (eight interviews and 44 YouTube narratives on LLM-assisted trading, plus 24 qualitative and mixed-method studies on robo-advice and social trading). Reflexive thematic analysis yielded five facilitative assistance facets and one adjacent risk facet (over-reliance), and these were translated into a 16-item PCA pool. Study 2 used a naïve-judge sort-and-rate task with 48 retail traders to test whether items show definitional correspondence to PCA and definitional distinctiveness from similar constructs: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust in the LLM, and trading self-efficacy. The resulting nine-item set is ready for subsequent factor-analytic and predictive validation. This study advances our understanding of how large language models shape retail trading behaviour by identifying and empirically grounding Perceived Cognitive Assistance as the decision-time psychological experience through which LLMs cognitively scaffold traders, clarifying how LLM use differs from generic technology adoption, trust, or self-efficacy effects.
Gimmelberg et al. (2026) studied this question.