PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Resolution of the Hierarchy Problem via Scale-Dependent Substrate Inertia and Harmonic Band Decoupling

View Full Paper
ABAnthony Bell

Key Points

  • The aim is to resolve the hierarchy problem by treating substrate inertia as a scale-dependent effective parameter in RSFT.
  • Derivation of the ratio between gravitational and electromagnetic substrate inertia within RSFT framework.
  • Formulation of a self-consistency equation for local energy density and substrate inertia.
  • Identification of a phase transition at a critical frequency based on geometric mean of two bands.
  • Closure of the hierarchy ratio using cuboctahedral geometry and back-reaction structure.
  • Establishment of a 10^{57} ratio between gravitational and electromagnetic substrate inertia.
  • Definition of the critical frequency as the geometric mean of specific vortex bands.
  • Demonstration of high-stiffness environments maintained by spinning vortex-solitons through rotational stress.

Abstract

This technical document presents a first-principles derivation of the 10^57 ratio between gravitational and electromagnetic substrate inertia within the Rotational Substrate Field Theory (RSFT) framework. By treating substrate inertia (B) as a scale-dependent effective parameter rather than a global constant, the author resolves the hierarchy problem identified in previous foundational sections. Key developments in this section include: Self-Consistency Equation: The derivation of an explicit form for g (r, ), governed by a self-consistency condition between local energy density and substrate inertia. Phase Transition Mechanism: Identification of a discrete "snap" or phase transition at a critical frequency (c), which is established as the geometric mean of the electromagnetic and dark-matter vortex bands. Geometric Closure: Numerical and algebraic closure of the hierarchy ratio using the cuboctahedral bond geometry (12³) and the pole structure of the back-reaction formalism, requiring no new parameters or fine-tuning. Physical Interpretation: A description of how spinning vortex-solitons maintain their own high-stiffness environment through rotational stress and back-reaction. This document is a companion to RSFT Version 3. 5. 1 - 6. 5. 1

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anthony Bell (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aff2659487ece0fa60b6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19391632
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper