PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Journal of Mid-life Health0 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Breast Cancer among Indian Women

View Full Paper
JSJyothi G SeshadriRGRuchika GargSSSwetha Shivaram

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify and analyze various risk factors contributing to breast cancer among Indian women.
  • Conducted a systematic search for case-control studies from January 2010 to April 2025.
  • Extracted data from 19 published studies to analyze breast cancer risk factors.
  • Used pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to determine risk levels and assessed heterogeneity with I² statistics.
  • Evaluated publication bias through funnel plots and Egger’s test, while appraising study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
  • Unmarried status and late age at marriage significantly increased breast cancer risk (OR=1.96 and OR=2.66, respectively).
  • A family history of breast cancer doubled the risk (OR=2.35) and prior benign breast disease had a substantial association (OR=4.28).
  • Central obesity significantly elevated risk (OR=2.74), while factors like non-vegetarian diet and tobacco use also showed strong associations (OR=1.62 and OR=1.67, respectively).
  • Reproductive factors like early menarche and late menopause were significantly related to higher breast cancer risk (OR=1.95 and OR=1.92, respectively).

Abstract

A BSTRACT Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among Indian women due to change in life style, reproductive patterns and rapid urbanization. Methods: A systematic search was conducted for case control studies published between January 2010 and April 2025. Data were extracted from 19 studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) ,heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics, while publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Sociodemographic risks included unmarried status (OR=1.96; 95% CI: 1.09–3.54) and late age at marriage > 21 years (OR= 2.66; 95% CI: 1.90–3.73). Family history of breast cancer doubled the risk (OR=2.35; 95% CI: 1.73–3.18), and past benign breast disease showed a strong association (OR=4.28; 95% CI: 2.50–7.35). Central obesity (WHR > 0.85) significantly increased risk (OR=2.74; 95% CI: 1.85–4.07), although BMI > 25 kg/m² alone was not significant. Lifestyle factors such as non-vegetarian diet (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.19–2.21), tobacco use (OR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.24–2.24), and high-fat diet (OR=4.20; 95% CI: 2.76–6.42) demonstrated strong associations. Reproductive risk factors—including early menarche (OR =1.95), late menopause (OR=1.92), OCP use (OR=2.01), low parity (OR=1.52), previous abortions (OR=2.48), and breastfeeding <6 months (OR= 4.12)—were all significantly linked to higher risk. Several subgroups exhibited notable heterogeneity and occasional publication bias. Conclusion: Modifiable risks present critical opportunities for prevention.Women with non-modifiable factors warrant targeted screening and risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seshadri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc70a79560c99a0a2013https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_376_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pregnancy and Lactation: Risk or Protective Factors for Breast Cancer?2020 · 26 citations
  2. 2Central obesity and breast cancer risk: a systematic review2003 · 394 citations
  3. 3Risk factors of female breast carcinoma: A case control study at Puducherry2013 · 71 citations
  4. 4MetaAnalysisOnline.com: Web-Based Tool for the Rapid Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies2025 · 199 citations
  5. 5Severe acne and risk of breast cancer2019 · 14 citations