PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 911: Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease mortality among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ in the United States.

View Full Paper
YPYancen PanZZZiad ZakariaJLJ Li

Key Result

Non-Hispanic Black and Pacific Islander women with ductal carcinoma in situ had higher cardiovascular mortality risks (HR 1.61 and 1.80) compared to non-Hispanic White women.

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the impact of race and ethnicity on cardiovascular disease mortality among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.
  • Analyzed data from women diagnosed with DCIS in the U.S. from 2000 to 2017.
  • Employed Fine and Gray regression to determine sub-distribution hazard ratios for cardiovascular mortality by race and ethnicity.
  • Adjusted for age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, surgery type, and radiotherapy.
  • Stratified analyses by age and year of diagnosis to identify trends.
  • Identified higher CVD mortality risk for NH-Black and NH-NHPI women compared to NH-White women.
  • Younger NH-Black and NH-NHPI women exhibited a significantly greater relative risk of CVD mortality.
  • Risk of CVD mortality increased over the years, particularly among NH-Black and NH-NHPI women.
  • At 5 and 10 years post-DCIS diagnosis, NH-Black and NH-NHPI women had the highest cumulative incidence of CVD mortality.

Structured PICO

Does race and ethnicity affect the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ?

P
Population
158,072 women diagnosed with a first primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) aged 20-84 between 2000 to 2017 in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, followed for more than one year. Mean age 58.47 years.
I
Intervention
Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NH-NHPI), Non-Hispanic Asian American (NH-AA), and Hispanic race/ethnicity (Exposure)
C
Comparator
Non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortalityhard clinical

Non-Hispanic Black and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander women with DCIS face significantly higher cardiovascular mortality risks compared to White women, highlighting the need for targeted cardio-oncology care and risk factor management in these vulnerable populations.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, which may be due to comorbidities or cancer treatment, yet prior studies examining racial and ethnic differences are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between race, ethnicity and CVD mortality among women diagnosed with DCIS in the United States. Methods: We included women diagnosed with a first primary DCIS aged 20-84 between 2000 to 2017 in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, and followed for more than one year. Fine and Gray regression was used to estimate sub-distribution hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD mortality by race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian American (NH-AA), NH-Black, NH-Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NH-NHPI), and NH-White), adjusting for age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, surgery type, and radiotherapy, and accounting for competing risks of non-CVD death. Models were further stratified by DCIS diagnosis age (50 and ≥ 50) and year (2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2017). Cumulative incidence of CVD mortality was also assessed by race and ethnicity, accounting for competing risks. Results: Among 158,072 women diagnosed with DCIS (median follow-up=6.80 years; mean age=58.47 years), 4,504 CVD deaths were identified (3,190 heart disease, 964 cerebrovascular disease, and 350 other CVD deaths). Compared to NH-White women, NH-Black and NH-NHPI women had a higher risk of CVD mortality (HRNH-Black = 1.61, 95%CI=1.48-1.76; HRNH-NHPI = 1.80, 95%CI=1.22-2.65) while NH-AA women had a lower risk of CVD mortality (HRNH-AA = 0.68, 95%CI=0.60-0.79). There was no significant association of CVD mortality for Hispanic women compared NH-White women (HRHispanic = 0.91, 95%CI=0.80-1.03). Although the increased risk of CVD mortality remained higher in NH-Black and NH-NHPI women regardless of age at DCIS diagnosis, younger women (50 years) had greater relative risk compared to older women (≥50 years) in stratified analyses (HRNH-Black, 50 = 3.93, 95%CI=2.62-5.90, HRNH-Black, ≥50 = 1.56, 95%CI=1.43-1.71; HRNH-NHPI,50 = 4.19, 95%CI=1.04-16.97, HRNH-NHPI, ≥50 = 1.73, 95%CI=1.16-2.59). Risk of CVD mortality increased by year of diagnosis, especially among NH-Black and NH-NHPI women. NH-Black and NH-NHPI women had the highest cumulative incidence of CVD mortality at 5-years (1.51%, 95%CI=1.33%-1.72% and 1.53% 95%CI=0.81%-2.66% respectively) and 10-years (4.29%, 95%CI=3.90%-4.70% and 4.17% 95%CI=2.62%-6.26% respectively) post DCIS diagnosis. Conclusions: NH-Black and NH-NHPI women diagnosed with DCIS had higher CVD mortality compared to NH-White women, especially among younger women and those diagnosed in recent years. Further studies are needed to understand multi-level factors driving the increased risk of CVD mortality in NH-Black and NH-NHPI women with DCIS. Citation Format: Yancen Pan, Ziad Zakaria, Jessica Li, Lene HS Viega, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Geetanjali Datta, Jacqueline B. Vo, Cody Ramin. Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease mortality among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ in the United States abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 911.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2026) studied this question. Non-Hispanic Black and Pacific Islander women with ductal carcinoma in situ had higher cardiovascular mortality risks (HR 1.61 and 1.80) compared to non-Hispanic White women.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fca7a79560c99a0a23d1https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-911
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper