PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention0 citations

Systemic glucocorticoid use and risk of site-specific cancers: a methodological systematic review of observational studies

View Full Paper
MCManon CairatEOElea OlivierJNJulie Neau

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess the impact of systemic glucocorticoids on site-specific cancer risks through observational studies.
  • Systematic review of observational studies published until May 1, 2025.
  • Included 38 cohort and case-control studies focused on glucocorticoid use and cancer risk.
  • Evaluated methodological quality, including time-window bias, lag-time, and population restrictions.
  • 34% of studies exhibited time-window bias.
  • 50% lacked adequate lag-time consideration.
  • Increased cancer risks were noted inconsistently for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung, and non-melanoma skin cancers, while null evidence was found for breast cancer.

Abstract

Abstract Systemic glucocorticoids, widely prescribed for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, have long been suspected of increasing cancer risk through immunosuppressive and metabolic effects. Randomized trials are often unethical and difficult to conduct, leaving observational studies the best option to determine whether use of systemic glucocorticoids impacts cancer development. However, these studies face significant methodological issues that may compromise the validity of their findings. We systematically reviewed observational studies published up to May 1, 2025 (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library). We included 38 cohort and case-control studies assessing systemic glucocorticoid use and site-specific cancer risks. All included prevalent users, 34% had time-window bias, 50% lacked appropriate lag-time, and 74% were not restricted to specific patient populations based on glucocorticoid indications. Some studies reported positive associations for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Similarly, some positive estimates were reported for lung and non-melanoma skin cancers, but these findings were inconsistent and likely influenced by inadequate latency consideration. In contrast, evidence was largely null for breast cancer, while results were inconsistent for colorectal cancer and melanoma. Our review highlights the need for robust study designs and analytical approaches to generate unbiased estimates of drugs’ effect on cancer incidence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cairat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fca7a79560c99a0a24b8https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-25-1965
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systemic Glucocorticoid Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer, Especially Early-Onset Type: A Nationwide Cohort Study2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Use of Systemic Glucocorticoids and Risk of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Evidence From a Danish Population‐Based Case–Control Study2025
  3. 3Dose–Response Association Between Systemic and Dermatologic Glucocorticoid Use and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Case–Control Study2026
  4. 4Early and High‐Dose Glucocorticoid Use and Survival in Advanced NSCLC Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Multicenter Target Trial Emulation2026
  5. 5THE ANALYSIS STUDY OF SAFETY AND LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF GLUCOCORTICOIDS IN TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASE: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW2024 · 2 citations