PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Production and Operations Management0 citations

EXPRESS: Scheduling Additive Manufacturing Systems: Complexity and Algorithms to Minimize the Number of Late Parts

View Full Paper
MSMichael D. StottMitchell InstituteCSChelliah SriskandarajahJSJon M. StaufferMitchell Institute

Key Points

  • The aim is to minimize the number of late parts in additive manufacturing to enhance patient welfare.
  • Analyzed nesting and scheduling problems within additive manufacturing.
  • Developed efficient algorithms for both fixed and variable nesting.
  • Conducted a computational study to evaluate algorithm performance.
  • The algorithm performed within 7% of the lower bound on average.
  • Demonstrated an effective method for scheduling challenging manufacturing scenarios.
  • Highlighted significant potential for improving customer satisfaction and firm profitability.

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a process by which three-dimensional products are made via the addition of material in a layer-by-layer fashion. This manufacturing technique is growing in commercial usage given its advantages in creating very dense or complex geometries as well as highly customizable components. In healthcare, for example, AM can be used to improve patient outcomes by providing timely medical devices (or parts) required for treatments. Minimizing the number of late parts in this context will directly improve the patients’ welfare. This paper studies the nesting and scheduling problem within the AM context and shows the problem of minimizing the number of late parts is strongly NP-hard even if the nesting of parts-into-jobs is given. We also develop efficient algorithms to minimize the number of late parts, both when nesting is fixed beforehand and when nesting is part of the algorithm. The theoretical results, including algorithm performance bounds, developed in this paper are new contributions to the literature. An extensive computational study evaluates the performance of both algorithms. The nesting and scheduling algorithm performs within 7% of the lower bound on average and shows an effective way to nest and schedule systems containing challenging problem instances. Providing efficient, high-performing algorithms such as these will allow AM managers to quickly schedule parts for AM production with a minimum number of late parts and consequently improve both customer satisfaction and profitability of the firm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stott et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd73a79560c99a0a3753https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478261442695
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of Time to Receipt of Prosthesis on Total Healthcare Costs 12 Months Postamputation2020 · 33 citations
  2. 2A Review of the Application of Additive Manufacturing in Prosthetic and Orthotic Clinics from a Biomechanical Perspective2020 · 137 citations
  3. 3An n Job, One Machine Sequencing Algorithm for Minimizing the Number of Late Jobs1968 · 704 citations
  4. 4Study of emerging avenues in supply chain resilience; the case of integration of additive manufacturing with spare parts procurement2022 · 20 citations
  5. 53D printing in dentistry2015 · 1,119 citations