PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 3928: Dynamic inflammatory biomarkers are associated with cancer cachexia in a prospective lung cancer cohort.

View Full Paper
EKElham KazemianCedars-Sinai Medical CenterCCCarlos D. Cruz-HernándezCedars-Sinai Medical CenterKRKaren L. ReckampCedars-Sinai Medical Center

Key Points

  • To identify inflammatory biomarkers associated with cancer cachexia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
  • Analyzed 27 stage IV NSCLC patients from the SeroNet-CORALE cohort with longitudinal plasma samples.
  • Quantified 40 biomarkers including cytokines, chemokines, and mitochondrial DNA using MesoScale Discovery platforms.
  • Applied Firth penalized logistic regression models to assess associations between biomarker levels and cachexia status.
  • 22% of patients classified as cachectic at diagnosis, with lower BMI in cachectic patients at follow-ups.
  • Elevated GDF15 and IL-15 associated with cachexia at T1, while IL-4 showed protective effects.
  • At T2, elevated mtDNA and decreased IL-5, IL12/IL23p40, and MDC were significantly linked to cachexia.
  • Baseline inflammatory biomarkers indicated future cachexia risk, particularly elevated MCP-1.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by progressive skeletal muscle loss that affects approximately 40-50% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Despite its clinical impact, reliable biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification remain poorly defined. Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study,we conducted an analysis of 27 patients with stage IV NSCLC from the SeroNet-CORALE cohort with at least two plasma samples collected between 2020-2023. Cachexia was defined according to international consensus criteria (weight loss 5% or 2% with BMI20 kg/m2 over 6 months). We quantified 40 biomarkers using MesoScale Discovery platforms, including inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, metabolic hormones, angiogenic factors, and mitochondrial DNA. Firth penalized logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between log2-transformed biomarker levels and cachexia status, with adjustment for age, sex, race, and treatment exposures. Results: We enrolled lung cancer patients (65% female, mean age 65±10 years) with predominantly adenocarcinoma histology (89 percent), and the proportion classified as cachectic was 22 percent at diagnosis and 20 percent and 19 percent at the subsequent timepoints. Cachectic patients showed consistently lower BMI (21.0±2.0 vs 27.0±7.0 at T1; 21.8±4.9 vs 25.2±4.9 at T2). At T1, cachexia was strongly associated with elevated GDF15 (OR: 4.29, 95% CI: 1.04-29.74, p=0.044) and IL-15 (OR: 43.83, 95% CI: 2.39-999, p=0.007), while IL-4 demonstrated protective effects (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.00-0.66, p=0.013). By T2, the biomarker profile had shifted, with significant associations emerging for elevated mtDNA (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.07-7.69, p=0.022) and reduced levels of IL-5 (OR: 0.17, p=0.011), IL12/IL23p40 (OR: 0.44, p=0.010), and MDC (OR: 0.26, p=0.006). Longitudinal analysis revealed that baseline inflammatory biomarkers were associated with future cachexia risk. Elevated MCP-1 at baseline showed a strong, though non-significant, trend toward association with increased odds of cachexia at the 6-month follow-up (OR: 3.72, 95% CI: 0.91-42.70, p=0.070). In contrast, higher levels of MDC (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.02-0.77, p=0.016) and TARC (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.04-0.96, p=0.041) at baseline were significantly associated with reduced odds of cachexia at the subsequent timepoint. Conclusion: This exploratory study reveals temporal variations in inflammatory profiles associated with cancer cachexia. While requiring validation in larger cohorts, the distinct biomarker patterns at different timepoints suggest cachexia biology may evolve from initial cytokine activation to later-stage mitochondrial and immune dysregulation. The association between baseline biomarkers and future cachexia development warrants cautious interpretation but may inform future research directions. Citation Format: Elham Kazemian, Carlos David Cruz-Hernandez, Karen L. Reckamp, Puneeth Iyengar, Neil A. Bhowmick, Jane C. Figueiredo, Kamya Sankar. Dynamic inflammatory biomarkers are associated with cancer cachexia in a prospective lung cancer cohort abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3928.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kazemian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdbfa79560c99a0a3fcehttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-3928
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Circulating Inflammatory and Mitochondrial Biomarkers Associated with Cachexia in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer2026 · 3 citations
  2. 2Abstract A008: Biomarkers of cachexia due to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from two Danish studies2025
  3. 3An integrated multidisciplinary analysis of pre-treatment cachexia in locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer.2026
  4. 4Association between systemic inflammation biomarkers and cancer cachexia in patients with gastric cancer: a cross-sectional study2026 · 4 citations
  5. 5Abstract 5420: Identifying dynamic subtypes of cancer cachexia using longitudinal clinical lab values.2026