PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Integrated versus standalone home-based records for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health in Nepal: A comparative qualitative study with descriptive quantitative profiling

View Full Paper
SSSudim SharmaANAnish NeupaneDKDikshya Kandel

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the utilization and implementation challenges of standalone and integrated home-based records in Nepal.
  • Conducted a comparative qualitative study with descriptive quantitative profiling between two provinces
  • Completed 100 semi-structured in-depth interviews with caregivers and health workers
  • Applied ‘kuragraphy’ for data collection and narrative construction
  • Analyzed socio-demographic data using SPSS and qualitative data thematically in Excel
  • Caregivers viewed home-based records as essential for tracking immunizations
  • Integrated home-based records were perceived as more user-friendly compared to standalone records
  • Limited family involvement in record management was observed
  • Implementation barriers included inadequate training and poor material quality of standalone records

Abstract

Background Home-Based Records (HBRs) are personal health documents intended to improve continuity of care and caregiver engagement across reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) services. In Nepal, both standalone (sHBR) and integrated (iHBR) models are implemented, yet comparative evidence on their utilization and implementation challenges is limited. This study examined utilization patterns and system-level barriers associated with sHBR in Madhesh Province and iHBR in Koshi Province. Methods We conducted a comparative qualitative study with descriptive quantitative profiling between May 17 and August 27, 2024. A total of 100 semi-structured in-depth interviews were completed with caregivers, health workers, Female Community Health Volunteers, and program managers across two provinces. The study applied “kuragraphy,” an ethnographic approach integrating interviews and field observations to construct contextual case narratives. Socio-demographic data were analyzed descriptively using the statistical package for the social Sciences (SPSS). Informed by the Human Centered Design (HCD) approach, the qualitative data were thematically analyzed in Excel using the Journey to Health and Immunization (JTHI) framework. Results Caregivers widely perceived HBRs as essential documents, primarily for immunization tracking and future service access. The iHBR was viewed as more comprehensive and user-friendly, particularly due to its illustrations, which improved comprehension among low-literacy users. However, understanding remained limited among illiterate and marginalized populations. Family involvement in record management was minimal and largely confined to mothers. Implementation barriers included inadequate training – particularly for iHBR use, limited decision-making authority among frontline health workers, incomplete documentation of non-immunization components, poor material quality of sHBR, and concerns regarding the sustainability of donor-supported iHBR initiatives. Conclusion HBR utilization in Nepal is shaped by caregiver literacy, gender dynamics, and health-system readiness. Strengthening training, supportive supervision, user-centered design, and sustainable supply mechanisms will be essential to optimize HBR effectiveness and support equitable RMNCH service delivery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdd4a79560c99a0a4145https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper