PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 2280: Ligand-activated AR promotes the survival of endocrine therapy-responsive ER+ breast cancer

View Full Paper
PAPatrick AouadESEliah R. ShamirJLJackson Liang

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the mechanisms of action and resistance in ER+ breast cancer treated with giredestrant.
  • Established multiple ER+ breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts.
  • Evaluated tumor responses to giredestrant in an intraductal xenograft model.
  • Conducted transcriptomic and chromatin profiling of treated tumors.
  • Assessed the effects of dual ER and AR inhibition compared to single ER antagonism.
  • Giredestrant treatment significantly reduced tumor proliferation and metastasis.
  • Activation of androgen receptor signaling was unexpectedly observed.
  • Increased ovarian testosterone production was linked to ER inhibition.
  • Dual inhibition of ER and AR provided stronger anti-proliferative effects.
  • Transcriptomic analysis indicated suppression of proliferation-associated programs via PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition.

Abstract

Abstract Giredestrant, a next-generation oral selective ERα degrader (SERD), is a potent and full antagonist that recently demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression free survival (PFS) in the phase III evERA Breast Cancer trial (NCT05306340). Given its potent ER antagonism, giredestrant is currently under evaluation in multiple clinical studies, including those involving premenopausal participants with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary (HPO) axis, both with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. To anticipate potential mechanisms of tumor cell survival and resistance, we sought to investigate the biology of giredestrant response in tumor-bearing mice with an intact HPO axis, using the intraductal xenograft model- a physiologically relevant system for ER+ breast cancer that supports tumor growth without exogenous estrogen. We established and characterized multiple ER+ breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived intraductal xenografts with distinct growth and metastatic profiles. Giredestrant treatment significantly suppressed tumor proliferation and reduced invasive and metastatic burden. Transcriptomic and chromatin profiling of giredestrant-treated tumors revealed a marked decrease in gene sets and chromatin sites associated with ER signaling and proliferation, as anticipated. Unexpectedly, giredestrant treatment also consistently led to the activation of androgen receptor (AR) signaling, which was accompanied by increased AR motif accessibility and chromatin occupancy. We find that systemic ER inhibition engages the HPO axis, resulting in increased ovarian production of testosterone, and thus driving ligand-dependent AR activation in tumor cells. Dual inhibition of ER and AR demonstrated enhanced anti-proliferative effects compared to ER antagonism alone. Transcriptomic data suggest that this is mediated by the suppression of proliferation-associated programs, potentially through PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition. By leveraging the novel mouse intraductal model, we identified dual ER and AR blockade, as well as ER-PI3K/mTOR pathway co-targeting, as promising therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for premenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer, particularly those not receiving GnRH agonists. Citation Format: Patrick Aouad, Eliah Shamir, Jackson Liang, Liang-Fu Chen, Vasumathi Kameswaran, Lisa Crocker, Marc Hafner, Bence Daniel, Antonina Hafner, Ciara Metcalfe, . Ligand-activated AR promotes the survival of endocrine therapy-responsive ER+ breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2280.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aouad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe07a79560c99a0a4828https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-2280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS1-12-11: Giredestrant immobilizes the Estrogen Receptor to potently suppress ER-active breast cancers2026
  2. 2Abstract PS17-01: Key drivers of therapeutic response and resistance to giredestrant from GO39932: a Phase Ia/b study in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Abstract 2285: TGFβ Induction: An essential tumor suppressive arm of next generation SERDs in ER+ breast cancer models in vitro2026
  4. 4Abstract GS1-10: Giredestrant vs standard-of-care endocrine therapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: Results from the global Phase III lidERA Breast Cancer trial2026 · 13 citations
  5. 5Abstract 2282: Targeting estrogen receptor mutations and aberrant myelopoiesis in hormone resistant breast cancer2026