PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 7832: Plasma epigenomic profiling captures B-cell lymphoma biology.

View Full Paper
AAAleem AamirSMSteven De MichinoMHMichael Hong

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the epigenomic landscape of H3K27me3 in B-cell lymphomas, focusing on its correlation with disease burden.
  • Conducted cfChIP-seq targeting H3K27me3 in 55 DLBCL, 19 FL, and 21 non-cancer controls.
  • Analyzed global read counts in 10kb genomic windows with background read subtraction and normalization.
  • Computed BCL scores using leave-one-out NNLS against healthy reference and high-burden lymphoma archetypes.
  • Advanced-stage BCL plasma H3K27me3 profiles differ from limited-stage and non-lymphoma samples.
  • Mean BCL scores are significantly higher in advanced-stage (p<0.0001) and limited-stage BCL (p<0.05) compared to controls.
  • H3K27me3 signal at promoter regions shows negative correlation with B-cell lineage markers, but positive correlation with other hematopoietic lineage markers.

Abstract

Abstract Background: B-cell lymphomas (BCLs), including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL), display widespread epigenetic dysregulation. The histone methyltransferase EZH2 catalyzes the repressive mark H3K27me3 and is an important epigenetic regulator for B-cell development. Although previous work has examined H3K27me3 in BCL tumour samples, the landscape of H3K27me3-decorated cell-free chromatin in BCL remains largely unexplored. Methods: We performed cfChIP-seq targeting H3K27me3 on n=55 DLBCL, n=19 FL, and n=21 non-cancer controls from the Princess Margaret LIBERATE study. For global analyses, reads were counted in 10kb genomic windows and background reads were subtracted using a truncated Poisson MLE and data were library size normalized. BCL scores were computed using leave-one-out NNLS against a healthy reference panel and a high-burden lymphoma archetype. For promoter analyses, reads ±2kb of the TSS were counted and library size normalized. Results: Global plasma H3K27me3 profiles in advanced-stage BCL separate from limited-stage BCL and non-lymphoma samples. Mean BCL scores were higher in advanced-stage BCL(p0.0001) and limited-stage BCL (p0.05) compared to non-lymphoma controls. Moreover, both DLBCL (p0.0001) and FL (p0.001) had higher mean BCL scores than non-lymphoma controls. BCL scores were highly correlated to PC1 (ρ=0.902, p=2.97e-35) and the orthogonal tumour fraction metrics including mean VAF from targeted sequencing (ρ=0.850, p=4.79e-18), ichorCNA tumour fraction from ∼0.5X WGS (ρ=0.779, p=3.86e-12), and total lesion glycolysis from FDG-PET/CT (ρ=0.669, p=1.37e-10). Correlation analysis between H3K27me3 signal at promoters and mean VAF revealed a negative association at B-cell lineage loci such as PAX5 (r=-0.705, p=1.29e-09) and DTX1 (r=-0.622, p=3.11e-07), and a positive association at other hematopoietic lineage loci such as MCEMP1 (r=0.746, p=4.1e-11) and IL6R (r=0.635, p=1.46e-07), indicating an increased contribution of B-cell lineage contribution with increasing tumour fraction. Conclusions: These data show that plasma H3K27me3 profiles capture disease burden and reflect underlying tumour biology in BCL. Furthermore, these profiles capture lineage-specific promoter repression patterns, manifesting in negative correlations between H3K27me3 signal B-cell lineage markers and tumour fraction, contrasting positive correlations observed at markers of other hematopoietic lineages. Overall, cfChIP-seq of H3K27me3 provides a non-invasive epigenomic readout of circulating cell-free chromatin in BCL. Citation Format: Aleem Aamir, Steven De Michino, Michael Hong, Ting Liu, Victoria Shelton, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Michael M. Hoffman, Mathieu Lupien, Robert Kridel, Benjamin Lok, Scott V. Bratman. Plasma epigenomic profiling captures B-cell lymphoma biology abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7832.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aamir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe07a79560c99a0a4891https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-7832
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Non-invasive classification & molecular subtyping of mature lymphoid neoplasms by cell-free DNA profiling2025
  2. 2Non-invasive detection and classification of lymphoma via cell-free DNA methylation profiling2025
  3. 3Abstract 7651: Evaluating epigenetic markers for naive, memory and overall B cells for disease diagnosis and prognosis in patients with B-CLL2024
  4. 4Abstract 1844: Epigenetic rewiring of BCL6 drives responses and unveils synthetic dependencies in large B cell lymphoma.2026
  5. 5Abstract P15: Cross-species DNA methylation profiling of T and B cell populations in T-PLL and B-CLL compared to TCL1 transgenic mouse models2024