PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Structures: A Comprehensive Review

View Full Paper
SOSAYEED OMAR

Key Points

  • The review aims to critically assess the advancements in piezoelectric energy harvesting specific to unmanned aerial vehicles.
  • Systematic literature review of 23 studies over 18 years
  • Evaluation of UAV vibration environments and unique power–motor-speed relationships
  • Comparison of piezoelectric materials and geometric optimization for energy harvesting
  • Assessment of energy storage solutions and power conditioning circuits
  • Achieved up to 75× improvement in harvested power through optimal transducer placement
  • Identified high-strain root placement as superior to high-displacement tip placement
  • Highlighted critical research gaps and proposed a four-stage experimental roadmap

Abstract

Abstract This review identifies a 75× improvement in harvested power achievable through optimal patch placement — challenging the conventional intuition of mounting piezoelectric transducers near the vibrating motor tip — and validates this finding across 23 independent studies spanning 18 years of UAV energy harvesting research (2008–2026). Small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) waste significant mechanical vibration energy throughout every flight phase. Piezoelectric energy harvesting (PEH) — the direct conversion of structural bending strain into electrical charge — offers a passive, zero-drag, no-moving-parts pathway to recover this energy for onboard structural health monitoring (SHM) sensors, wireless nodes, or supplementary power storage. This article provides the first systematic, critical review of UAV-specific PEH, covering 23 studies across the period 2008–2026. Six thematic domains are critically examined: (i) the UAV vibration environment, including the non-monotonic power–motor-speed relationship unique to variable-throttle multirotors; (ii) piezoelectric materials, contrasting PZT ceramic patches and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) polymer films; (iii) structural modelling, from open-source Python Euler–Bernoulli finite element analysis (FEA) to coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD)–ANSYS workflows; (iv) harvester placement and geometry optimisation, where a critical evaluation of six independent studies confirms that high-strain root placement outperforms high-displacement tip placement by 12.7–75×; (v) broadband harvesting strategies applicable to the variable-RPM (revolutions per minute) environment; and (vi) power conditioning circuits and energy storage. Seven comparative tables and four original figures are provided. Three critically assessed convergent findings and four research gaps are identified, with a four-stage experimental roadmap proposed to advance the field from simulation to flight-proven systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

SAYEED OMAR (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe18a79560c99a0a4a7dhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19399792
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper