PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2026Nursing and Health Sciences1 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of Real‐Time Data Analytics on Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Ophthalmology: A Nursing Perspective on Patient Outcomes and Cost‐Effectiveness

View Full Paper
ZCZhenhui ChenSWShengcheng WuYZYi Zhou

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate how real-time data analytics affects infection prevention and control in ophthalmic surgeries.
  • Conducted a single-center retrospective study
  • Analyzed data from 213 patients between 2022-2024
  • Compared a conventional care group (n=105) to a real-time data analytics group (n=108)
  • Measured outcomes included infection rates, visual acuity, pain scores, quality of life, and costs.
  • Real-time data analytics group had lower infection rates (p=0.032)
  • Improved visual acuity (p=0.042) and reduced pain scores (p=0.024)
  • Higher quality of life scores (p=0.036) and better visual function (p=0.032)
  • Direct medical costs significantly lower (p<0.001) with an ICER of -11656.22 yuan/QALY.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ophthalmic surgeries pose infection risks. Traditional control methods rely on manual monitoring, creating a need for more precise, data‐driven nursing models. This study evaluated the effectiveness of real‐time data analysis in improving ophthalmic infection prevention and control outcomes. This study was designed as a single‐center retrospective study. We analyzed 213 patients (2022–2024). The conventional group ( n = 105) received conventional care, while the real‐time data analytics group ( n = 108) received real‐time data‐driven infection prevention and control. Measured outcomes included infection rates, complications, visual acuity, quality of life, visual function, pain scores, costs, and cost‐effectiveness. The real‐time data analytics group showed significantly better outcomes: lower infection rates ( p = 0.032), better visual acuity ( p = 0.042), and less pain ( p = 0.024). They also had higher quality of life ( p = 0.036) and visual function scores ( p = 0.032). Direct medical costs and nursing costs were significantly lower ( p < 0.001), with the ICER was −11656.22 yuan/QALY, indicating a dominant economic result. Real‐time data analysis enables dynamic risk monitoring and precise interventions in ophthalmic nursing. This approach reduces infections, improves visual outcomes, lowers costs, and enhances cost‐effectiveness, supporting standardized quality improvement in infection prevention and control.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49f44b33cc4c35a227c50https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70327
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper