PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2026Cancers1 citationsOpen Access

Machine-Learning-Based Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma Using Graph-Theoretical Analysis of Structural Network Alterations

View Full Paper
ASAndreas StadlbauerSOStefan OberndorferGHGertraud Heinz

Key Points

  • The research aims to improve overall survival prediction in glioblastoma by analyzing structural brain network alterations using machine learning.
  • Used preoperative DTI data from 871 glioblastoma patients to create structural connectomes.
  • Extracted graph-theoretical metrics from the connectomes and combined them with clinical data.
  • Trained and validated ten ML models on 784 patients and tested the top three on a separate cohort of 87 patients.
  • Random forest, adaptive boosting, and KStar showed the highest validation performance.
  • Random forest models achieved accuracies of 0.862 and 0.874 in predicting survival beyond one year.
  • Key predictors included strength and clustering coefficient, particularly in the temporal lobe.

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma is an extremely aggressive brain tumor that diffusely infiltrates white matter and alters large-scale brain connectivity. Most prognostic models focus on localized tumor features and clinical variables, overlooking broader effects on the brain’s structural connectome. This study addressed this limitation by integrating graph-theoretical analysis of preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived structural connectomes with machine learning (ML) to improve prediction of overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Preoperative DTI data from 871 glioblastoma patients from the UPenn-GBM and UCSF-PDGM cohorts were processed to construct whole-brain structural connectomes weighted by tract count and quantitative anisotropy (QA). Global and nodal graph-theoretical network metrics were extracted and combined with demographic and clinical information. Ten ML models were trained and validated on 784 patients (90% of the cohort). The three best-performing algorithms were tested on a held-out cohort of 87 patients (10%). Results: Random forest, adaptive boosting, and KStar showed the strongest validation performance. In held-out internal testing, random forest models using degree and QA-weighted strength achieved accuracies of 0.862 and 0.874, with AUROCs of 0.929 and 0.909, for predicting OS beyond one year. Strength and clustering coefficient were key predictors, with over two-thirds of significant nodes localized in the temporal lobe, particularly the parahippocampal, and superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri. Conclusions: Graph-theoretical quantification of structural brain network disruption combined with ML allows accurate prediction of OS in glioblastoma. These results support a network-based conceptualization of the disease and indicate that connectome-derived metrics may complement established prognostic frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stadlbauer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49fe5b33cc4c35a228647https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18071161
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper