PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2017Journal of Clinical Oncology514 citationsOpen Access

Validation and Modification of a Prediction Model for Acute Cardiac Events in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy Based on Three-Dimensional Dose Distributions to Cardiac Substructures

VBVeerle A.B. van den BogaardBTBastiaan D.P. TaASA. van der Schaaf

Structured PICO

Do specific cardiac substructure dose-distribution parameters, such as LV-V5, better predict acute coronary events than mean heart dose in female breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy?

P
Population
910 consecutive female patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.
I
Intervention
Radiotherapy (evaluating three-dimensional dose distributions to cardiac substructures, specifically mean heart dose [MHD] and volume of the left ventricle receiving 5 Gy [LV-V5]).
O
Outcome
Cumulative incidence of acute coronary events (ACEs) within 9 years of follow-up.hard clinical

The volume of the left ventricle receiving 5 Gy (LV-V5) is a stronger predictor of acute coronary events than overall mean heart dose in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, highlighting the need to minimize left ventricular radiation exposure.

Abstract

Purpose A relationship between mean heart dose (MHD) and acute coronary event (ACE) rate was reported in a study of patients with breast cancer (BC). The main objective of our cohort study was to validate this relationship and investigate if other dose-distribution parameters are better predictors for ACEs than MHD. Patients and Methods The cohort consisted of 910 consecutive female patients with BC treated with radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery. The primary end point was cumulative incidence of ACEs within 9 years of follow-up. Both MHD and various dose-distribution parameters of the cardiac substructures were collected from three-dimensional computed tomography planning data. Results The median MHD was 2.37 Gy (range, 0.51 to 15.25 Gy). The median follow-up time was 7.6 years (range, 0.1 to 10.1 years), during which 30 patients experienced an ACE. The cumulative incidence of ACE increased by 16.5% per Gy (95% CI, 0.6 to 35.0; P = .042). Analysis showed that the volume of the left ventricle receiving 5 Gy (LV-V5) was the most important prognostic dose-volume parameter. The most optimal multivariable normal tissue complication probability model for ACEs consisted of LV-V5, age, and weighted ACE risk score per patient (c-statistic, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91). Conclusion A significant dose-effect relationship was found for ACEs within 9 years after RT. Using MHD, the relative increase per Gy was similar to that reported in the previous study. In addition, LV-V5 seemed to be a better predictor for ACEs than MHD. This study confirms the importance of reducing exposure of the heart to radiation to avoid excess risk of ACEs after radiotherapy for BC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bogaard et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56eca75589c71d767d65bhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.8480
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper