PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2023Journal of the American Heart Association27 citationsOpen Access

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Aging: A Review by the VascAgeNet COST Action

View Full Paper
EBElisabetta BianchiniMLMai Tone LønnebakkenPWPeter Wohlfahrt

Structured PICO

I
Intervention
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for the noninvasive assessment of arterial aging

This review provides a comprehensive guide on the use of advanced MRI and CT imaging biomarkers for the noninvasive assessment of aortic aging and cardiovascular risk.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography allow the characterization of arterial state and function with high confidence and thus play a key role in the understanding of arterial aging and its translation into the clinic. Decades of research into the development of innovative imaging sequences and image analysis techniques have led to the identification of a large number of potential biomarkers, some bringing improvement in basic science, others in clinical practice. Nonetheless, the complexity of some of these biomarkers and the image analysis techniques required for their computation hamper their widespread use. In this narrative review, current biomarkers related to aging of the aorta, their founding principles, the sequence, and postprocessing required, and their predictive values for cardiovascular events are summarized. For each biomarker a summary of reference values and reproducibility studies and limitations is provided. The present review, developed in the COST Action VascAgeNet, aims to guide clinicians and technical researchers in the critical understanding of the possibilities offered by these advanced imaging modalities for studying the state and function of the aorta, and their possible clinically relevant relationships with aging.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bianchini et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56ee875589c71d767d78fhttps://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.122.027414
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long-Term Prognosis After Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Among Low-Intermediate Risk Women and Men2016 · 89 citations
  2. 2Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Coronary Artery Calcification in Low-Risk Women2016 · 141 citations
  3. 3Reference ranges (“normal values”) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update2020 · 617 citations
  4. 4Automated estimation of aortic strain from steady‐state free‐precession and phase contrast MR images2010 · 42 citations
  5. 5Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Arterial Age Versus Framingham 10-Year or Lifetime Cardiovascular Risk2012 · 24 citations