PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 21, 2007New England Journal of Medicine1,442 citationsOpen Access

Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials

View Full Paper
RWRui WangSLStephen W. LagakosJWJames H. Ware

Key Points

  • Examine the methodological strengths and limitations of subgroup analyses in clinical trials while presenting journal reporting standards.
  • Evaluated methodological principles and statistical pitfalls associated with subgroup analyses across clinical trial data sets.
  • Outlined updated journal publication policies governing the reporting and interpretation of subgroup findings.
  • Identified critical risks of false-positive findings and misleading conclusions arising from unplanned or inadequately powered subgroup evaluations.
  • Established reporting criteria to ensure subgroup claims are appropriately pre-specified, statistically contextualized, and cautiously interpreted.

Abstract

The analysis of subgroups is often used as a way to glean additional information from data sets. The strengths and weaknesses of this approach and new Journal policies concerning the reporting of subgroup analyses are discussed in this article.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5760e734fad6b67f4c91dhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr077003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper