PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026PLOS Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

Adopting and validating a technology acceptance model-based paradigm to assess acceptance and satisfaction with electronic health information system by healthcare providers in resource-limited governmental and non-governmental hospitals

View Full Paper
ADAhmad DweikatNDNidal Yousef DwaikatRSRamzi Shawahna

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess healthcare providers' acceptance and satisfaction with electronic health information systems using an extended Technology Acceptance Model.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional survey with 220 healthcare professionals in Palestinian hospitals.
  • Assessed eight Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) constructs and TAM beliefs regarding EHIS.
  • Employed partial least squares structural equation modeling to validate the model and measure relationships.
  • The model explained 68% of variance in perceived usefulness and 57% in perceived ease of use.
  • Both perceived ease of use and usefulness significantly predicted behavioral intention towards EHIS adoption.
  • System quality had a positive effect on perceived usefulness and ease of use, while competitive pressure was strongly associated with both.

Abstract

In resource-limited healthcare settings, adoption of electronic health information systems (EHIS) depends on provider acceptance and satisfaction. This study extended the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) factors to capture contextual influences in Palestinian hospitals. A cross-sectional survey of 220 healthcare professionals (December 2023-June 2024) assessed eight TOE constructs, including relative advantage, system quality, compatibility, complexity, top management support, IT support/training, and competitive pressure, alongside TAM beliefs (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use) and behavioral intention. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) confirmed reliability and validity (indicator loadings 0.76-0.96; Cronbach’s α 0.72-0.91; AVE 0.64-0.91; SRMR 0.075-0.079). The model explained 68% of variance in perceived usefulness, 57% in ease of use, and 74% in behavioral intention. Both ease of use (β = 0.43, p < 0.001) and usefulness (β = 0.39, p < 0.001) significantly predicted intention. System quality positively influenced usefulness (β = 0.30, p < 0.001) and ease of use (β = 0.23, p < 0.001). Competitive pressure was strongly associated with both constructs (PU: β = 0.23, p = 0.004; PEOU: β = 0.37, p < 0.001). Complexity showed no significant effect. Hierarchical regression confirmed TOE-TAM constructs explained 51–76% additional variance beyond demographics. The validated TAM-TOE instrument demonstrated robust psychometric properties and strong explanatory power for EHIS acceptance in resource-constrained contexts. Key levers for implementation include enhancing system quality, leveraging competitive pressure, aligning EHIS with workflows, and reinforcing organizational support. This tool provides evidence-based guidance to accelerate EHIS uptake, optimize clinical processes, and improve patient outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dweikat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f0d774eaea4b11a7a4d2https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001343
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper