PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Effects of temperature, brine, and inhibitor chemistry on emulsion stability in gas condensate systems under pipeline mixing conditions

MMMohammad Amin Behnam MotlaghADAmir Hossein Saeedi DehaghaniHTHadi Tanhaei

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how temperature, brine, and inhibitor chemistry impact emulsion stability in gas condensate systems.
  • Conducted experiments at condensate-to-water ratios of 4:1 and 2:2.
  • Investigated four temperatures: 12, 30, 45, and 70 °C.
  • Samples were agitated with controlled high-shear pulses.
  • Measured separated water and emulsion volumes at different settling times.
  • At 12 °C, CI with brine produced large but short-lived emulsions (~165 mL at 5 min, decreasing to ~71 mL at 1 h).
  • At higher water cut (2:2), CI with brine generated larger emulsions (up to ~195 mL initially, ~20 mL remaining after 24 h).
  • Emulsions diminished at 70 °C with sludge-like interfacial layers dominating.
  • Heating produced larger emulsions compared to cooling at the same temperature.

Abstract

In oil and gas production, the coexistence of water and condensate in subsea pipelines often leads to emulsion formation, complicating separation processes and increasing operational challenges in flow assurance. Emulsions can be stabilized or destabilized depending on temperature, salinity, inhibitor chemistry, and water cut, yet their combined effects remain poorly understood. This study investigates the emulsification tendency and phase behavior of South Pars condensates (SPD10 and SPD15) under pipeline-representative mixing. Experiments were conducted at condensate-to-water ratios of 4:1 and 2:2, across four temperatures (12, 30, 45, and 70 °C). Samples were agitated with controlled high-shear pulses, and separated water and emulsion volumes were monitored at different settling times. Results show that at low temperature (12 °C), corrosion inhibitor (CI) with brine produced large but short-lived emulsions (~ 165 mL at 5 min decreasing to ~ 71 mL at 1 h), while kinetic hydrate inhibitor alone did not generate stable emulsions. At higher water cuts (2:2), CI with brine generated much larger emulsions, up to ~ 195 mL initially and ~ 20 mL remaining after 24 h, compared with rapid collapse when deionized water was used. At 70 °C, emulsions diminished and sludge-like interfacial layers dominated. Thermal path also influenced stability, as heating produced larger emulsions than cooling at the same set point. MEG/MDEA blends acted as non-emulsifiers but consistently produced sludge. Overall, the findings highlight CI–brine interactions as the main driver of emulsion and sludge formation. Water cut and thermal history strongly affect stability, offering insights for inhibitor screening and flow-assurance design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Motlagh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f10974eaea4b11a7a91dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47401-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper