PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026New Zealand Journal of Botany0 citations

Genomic Evidence Supports the Recognition of Gentianella waipara Comb. et Stat. nov. as a Distinct Species from G. calcis (Gentianaceae)

View Full Paper
RERobb W. Eastman‐DensemDGDavid GlennyPHPeter B. Heenan

Key Points

  • To determine the taxonomic status of Gentianella waipara based on genetic and morphological evidence.
  • Conducted conservation genetics study on Gentianella calcis and related species.
  • Analyzed genetic divergence between Gentianella waipara and G. calcis.
  • Compared morphological characters of both species.
  • Gentianella waipara was found to be genetically divergent from G. calcis and G. astonii.
  • Morphological comparison revealed distinct features in leaves and calyx structure.
  • Elevated Gentianella waipara to species rank based on genetic and morphological findings.

Abstract

Gentianella calcis subsp. waipara Glenny & Molloy (Gentianaceae) is endemic to limestone formations in North Canterbury, New Zealand. A previous conservation genetics study of G. calcis Glenny & Molloy and another eastern South Island limestone endemic species, G. astonii (Petrie) T.N.Ho & S.W.Liu, showed that G. calcis subsp. waipara is genetically divergent from both taxa. Based on these findings and comparison of morphological characters, this taxon is here elevated to species rank as Gentianella waipara (Glenny & Molloy) Eastman‐Densem comb. et stat. nov. Compared to G. calcis , this species is recognised by its strongly folded leaves with more recurved tips, and no or few calyx sinus hairs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eastman‐Densem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f14b74eaea4b11a7ae8ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/nzb2.70084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper