PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions255 citations

Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat™ for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study

View Full Paper
CMCarlo Di MarioMSMara SansaFAFlavio Airoldi

Structured PICO

Does multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty improve clinical or economical outcomes compared to culprit-lesion-only treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) undergoing primary angioplasty
I
Intervention
Multivessel treatment (stenting) during primary angioplasty
C
Comparator
Culprit lesion only initial treatment
O
Outcome
Need for subsequent clinically driven revascularization, clinical advantages, and economical advantages

A staged approach to multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty for AMI is preferred, as initial aggressive multivessel stenting offers no additional clinical or economic advantages.

Abstract

Multivessel treatment during primary PTCA was safe in this controlled trial. However, when only the culprit lesion was initially treated, the need for subsequent clinically driven revascularization remained low and no clinical or economical advantages were obtainable with a more aggressive initial approach. In clinical practice, a staged approach to multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty avoids to treat unnecessarily non clinically relevant lesions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mario et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6871c49dce5ab9d88b460https://doi.org/10.1080/14628840310030441
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper