PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 23, 2008Organization Science563 citations

Perspective—Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process

View Full Paper
KLKaren LockeKGKaren Golden‐BiddleMFMartha S. Feldman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this paper, we want to shift the attention of our scholarly community to the living condition of doubt and its underappreciated significance for the theorizing process. Drawing on Peirce's notion of abduction, we articulate the relationship between doubt and belief in the everyday imaginative work central to theorizing, and establish the role played by doubt as abduction's engine in these efforts. We propose three strategic principles for engaging and using doubt in the research process. In concluding, we explore our field's overemphasis on validation to the exclusion of discovery processes and to the detriment of excellence in theorizing. We call for a broadening of our notions of “methodology” to incorporate discovery processes and to begin their explication.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Locke et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6bee31a315865a9ab3243https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0398
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper