PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2012Psychological Review1,345 citations

Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor.

View Full Paper
MKMichael W. KrausPPPaul K. PiffRMRodolfo Mendoza‐Denton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Social class is shaped by an individual’s material resources as well as perceptions of rank vis-à-vis others in society, and in this article, we examine how class influences behavior. Diminished resources and lower rank create contexts that constrain social outcomes for lower-class individuals and enhance contextualist tendencies—that is, a focus on external, uncontrollable social forces and other individuals who influence one’s life outcomes. In contrast, abundant resources and elevated rank create contexts that enhance the personal freedoms of upper-class individuals and give rise to solipsistic social cognitive tendencies—that is, an individualistic focus on one’s own internal states, goals, motivations, and emotions. Guided by this framework, we detail 9 hypotheses and relevant empirical evidence concerning how class-based contextualist and solipsistic tendencies shape the self, perceptions of the social environment, and relationships to other individuals. Novel predictions and implications for research in other socio-political contexts are considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kraus et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6c2bbf174babf6cab36afhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper